Source: International Congress 2017 – What is new in COPD diagnosis and classification?
Disease area: Airway diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
A. Ben Saad (Monastir, Tunisia). Differences between GOLD Group C and D: More than mMRC or CAT. 3632

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Agreement Between COPD Assessment Test (CAT) And Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scores For GOLD COPD Classification: A Cross-Sectional Analyses Source: International Congress 2019 – Clinical implications of COPD management Year: 2019 Are the mMRC dyspnea scale of 2 and a CAT score of 10 equivalent as proposed by the GOLD strategy? Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – COPD and the impact of comorbidities Year: 2020 Clinical and prognostic heterogeneity of C and D GOLD groups Source: Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 250-254 Year: 2015 Late Breaking Abstract - Adherence to GOLD recommendations in Italian COPD patients stratified by GOLD groups A–D: The MISTRAL study Source: International Congress 2017 – Primary care pulmonary rehabilitation, multimorbidity and organisation of care Year: 2017 Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores and FENO correlation Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Miscellaneous pulmonary pharmacology Year: 2007 Comparison of modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale cut point ≥1 with COPD assessment test (CAT) ≥10 to differentiate low and high symptom COPD patients Source: Annual Congress 2012 - GOLD guidelines 2011: new assessment of COPD Year: 2012 Pulmonary function tests, exercise capacity and health status in GOLD A, B, C, D groups Source: International Congress 2014 – Monitoring airway diseases with lung function tests Year: 2014 Comparison of individual items of COPD Assessment Test (CAT) at baseline in the EMAX and IMPACT trials Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – New tools for diagnosis of obstructive diseases Year: 2020 Comparison between electronic and paper versions of the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS) and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Source: International Congress 2017 – What is new in COPD diagnosis and classification? Year: 2017 Relationship of mMRC and CAT scores in COPD patients Source: Annual Congress 2013 –The latest insights in pulmonary rehabilitation (part 2) Year: 2013 COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores following a digital health intervention Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – COPD phenotypes Year: 2020 Comparison of CAT and mMRC in terms of assessing symptom status in stable COPD patients Source: International Congress 2018 – Patient-reported outcomes and scores in COPD Year: 2018 CAT’ or ’mMRC’ – Which is a better symptom scale in recent GOLD COPD classification? Source: International Congress 2015 – COPD: interesting notes Year: 2015 COPD Assessment Test (CAT) has a positive relationship with exacerbations in COPD patients. Source: International Congress 2019 – Clinical implications of COPD management Year: 2019 Association of Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) with asthma exacerbation Source: International Congress 2018 – Clinical and functional monitoring in airway disease Year: 2018 Correlation between COPD assessment test (CAT) and mMRC dyspnea scale in evaluationg COPD symptoms Source: International Congress 2019 – Epidemiology of airway diseases in primary care Year: 2019 Association between COPD bronchial brush microbiome-determined ?Proteobacteria:Firmicutes (G:F) ratio and GOLD grade and symptoms Source: International Congress 2019 – Evaluation of basic science in airway diseases Year: 2019 Comparability of Asthma Control TestÔ (ACT) scores between different administration forms Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Wider aspects of managing respiratory disease in primary care Year: 2008 Asthma Control Test (ACT) or Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)? - validity and responsiveness in children. Source: International Congress 2017 – Diagnostic tools in paediatric asthma Year: 2017 Comparisons of health status scores with MRC grades in COPD: implications for the GOLD 2011 classification Source: Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 647-654 Year: 2013