e-learning
resources
Milan 2017
Monday, 11.09.2017
Discussion of techniques and technologies in lung function
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
Time of maximal spirometric change after bronchodilator inhalation
M. Hegewald (Murray, United States of America)
Source:
International Congress 2017 – Discussion of techniques and technologies in lung function
Session:
Discussion of techniques and technologies in lung function
Session type:
Poster Discussion
Number:
3007
Disease area:
Airway diseases
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
M. Hegewald (Murray, United States of America). Time of maximal spirometric change after bronchodilator inhalation. 3007
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Panel discussion: Diagnostic tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea in adults and children
Expert interview: Physiological classification of lung function impairment
Occupational exposures to respiratory diseases: A case-based discussion
Related content which might interest you:
Characterization of bronchodilator response by spirometry and plethismography
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Going with the flow: assessment and evaluation of airway function and its role in patient management
Year: 2012
How often FEV
1
underestimates bronchodilator response?
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 100s
Year: 2003
Parameters of spirometry and forced oscillations for the evaluation of the bronchodilatation response
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 575s
Year: 2004
Comparison of bronchodilator responsiveness between forced oscillation technique and spirometry
Source: International Congress 2018 – Improvements in the assessment of paediatric physiology
Year: 2018
Comparison of bronchodilatator response of FEV
1
and airway resistance
Source: Annual Congress 2003 - Assessing airway function: practicalities and clinical applications
Year: 2003
Impulse oscillometry parameters of COPD patients during inspiration and expiration and the effect of tiotropium inhalation therapy
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Beyond spirometry: the skills behind lung function testing
Year: 2008
Bronchodilator reversibility testing in COPD using an inspiratory peak flow meter
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Treatment of COPD
Year: 2007
Effects of inhaled histamine and methacholine on the lung function parameters obtained by spirometry and forced oscillations in asthmatic children
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Lung function from infancy to adulthood
Year: 2010
Spirometric mid-flow measured at six seconds is equivalent to FEV
1
for identifying a bronchodilator response
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Quality measurement and improvement in lung function
Year: 2010
Utility of peak expiratory flow for bronchodilator reversibility assessment
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Lung function II
Year: 2007
Changes in respiratory resistance of mild asthmatic children after administraton of a bronchodilator measured by the forced oscillation technique
Source: Annual Congress 2004 - Airway resistance: application and technique
Year: 2004
The influence of FVC manoeuvres on consecutive FEV
1
values during methacholine challenge
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 587s
Year: 2004
The (un)importance of the time-interval between inhalation and FEV
1
measurement in a methacholine challenge test
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 183s
Year: 2004
The bronchodilator responsiveness in adult asthmatic patients assessed with the forced oscillation technique and forced expiration
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Airways mechanics in different applications
Year: 2010
Should bronchodilator response be assessed in all asthmatic children with normal baseline spirometry?
Source: International Congress 2018 – New ideas about respiratory and sleep physiology in children
Year: 2018
Assessment of airway responsiveness: Comparison of forced spirometry and body plethysmography for methacholine challenge tests
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Advances in lung function II
Year: 2010
Baseline FEV
1
and sputum neutrophils and macrophages predict the decrease in FEV
1
after inhaled corticosteroid withdrawal in COPD
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 306s
Year: 2004
Time to maximal response to bronchodilators in asthmatic children
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 281s
Year: 2006
Comparison of variations of FEV
1
and forced oscillation technique during methacholine challenge
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 339s
Year: 2004
Immediate bronchodilator response in FEV
1
as a diagnostic criterion for adult asthma
Source: Eur Respir J, 53 (2) 1800904; 10.1183/13993003.00904-2018
Year: 2019
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept