How to assess central aspects of a scientific paper (ethics, originality, structure)

Marcos I. Restrepo (San Antonio, United States of America)

Source: International Congress 2015 – Review articles and abstracts
Session: Review articles and abstracts
Session type: How to
Number: 3175

WebcastSlide presentationMultimedia files

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
Marcos I. Restrepo (San Antonio, United States of America). How to assess central aspects of a scientific paper (ethics, originality, structure). International Congress 2015 – Review articles and abstracts

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
The new proposals: what are they, what do they mean for us?
Source: Annual Congress 2006 - Medicines for children: the impact of proposed new EU legislation
Year: 2006


How to present a scientific paper at a conference
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - PG22 - Writing and presenting scientific work at meetings: an interactive, hands-on course
Year: 2007



From research question to dissemination: how to design, analyse and present study results
Source: Breathe, 14 (3) 232; 10.1183/20734735.020018
Year: 2018



How to apply evidence based practice critique method to review of guidelines
Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Workshop: evidence-based practice: an approach to care
Year: 2005

Doing science: how to get credit for your scientific work
Source: Breathe 2015; 11:153-155
Year: 2015


Effectively publishing scientific work - moderated discussion
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – How to effectively publish scientific work?
Year: 2021


A bibliometric evaluation of European Union research of the respiratory system from 1987-1998
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 17: 1175-1180
Year: 2001



Some principles and practices of genetic biobanking studies
Source: Eur Respir J 2009; 33: 419-425
Year: 2009



Defining a review question and writing a protocol
Source: International Congress 2015 – How to perform and interpret systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Year: 2015


Reviewing recent research on peer review: myths and reality
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - BMJ/ERJ Symposium – Peer reviewing
Year: 2011

Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks
Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: 373-382
Year: 2007



Introduction of characteristics of evidence-based practice
Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Workshop: evidence-based practice: an approach to care
Year: 2005

Research in Europe: from basic science to interdisciplinary approach
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –President Summit 2013 update: Research gaps, patient needs & innovative solutions: a forward look on lung health research
Year: 2013


How to optimise patient and public involvement in your research: Doing science
Source: Breathe 2015; 11:223-227
Year: 2015


From patients to research laboratories and back: overview of the major scientific achievements and their impact in TB diagnosis, clinical management and control
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –The best of TB PANNET
Year: 2013


Doing science: How to submit a successful funding application
Source: Breathe 2016; 12: 73-77
Year: 2016


PDW7 Ethical issues in modern day respiratory research and medicine - Limited to 50 places.
Source: Milan 2017 - Educational material
Year: 2017