e-learning
resources
Amsterdam 2015
Monday, 28.09.2015
How to perform and interpret systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
(Non-)sense to interpret meta-analyses with heterogeneous interventions: the example of non-pharmacological interventions
Milo Puhan (Zurich, Switzerland)
Source:
International Congress 2015 – How to perform and interpret systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Session:
How to perform and interpret systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Session type:
Symposium
Number:
1723
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
Milo Puhan (Zurich, Switzerland). (Non-)sense to interpret meta-analyses with heterogeneous interventions: the example of non-pharmacological interventions. International Congress 2015 – How to perform and interpret systematic reviews and meta-analyses
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Panel discussion: Diagnostic tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea in adults and children
Expert interview: Physiological classification of lung function impairment
Occupational exposures to respiratory diseases: A case-based discussion
Related content which might interest you:
Identifying inconsistencies in intervention descriptors and outcome reporting within systematic reviews of physical activity interventions in COPD
Source: International Congress 2018 – Exploring the importance of daily physical activity in chronic respiratory disease
Year: 2018
Systematic review to examine the impact of psycho-educational interventions on health outcomes and costs in patients with difficult asthma
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 536s
Year: 2003
Characteristics of effective self-management interventions in patients with COPD: individual patient data meta-analysis
Source: Eur Respir J 2016; 48: 55-68
Year: 2016
How to make interventions more successful in the future
Source: International Congress 2015 – PG13 Monitoring physical activity
Year: 2015
Do we need a gender-specific approach for health interventions?
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Highlights on gender and respiratory health
Year: 2021
Barriers and facilitators at attending mindfulness-based intervention programs of people with COPD. A systematic qualitative review
Source: International Congress 2019 – Nursing care across the spectrum of respiratory illnesses
Year: 2019
A study of organizational effectiveness: identifying variables that predict successful respiratory therapy education programs
Source: Annual Congress 2006 - Assessments of impairment in adults and children, and airway clearance techniques
Year: 2006
Using population insight studies to define effective prevention and identification interventions in COPD
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Quality of diagnosis and assessment in primary care
Year: 2011
Web-based self-management support after pulmonary rehabilitation of difficult to treat asthma: a randomised controlled trial
Source: International Congress 2017 – Techniques to treat asthma
Year: 2017
Effect of “add-on” interventions on exercise training in individuals with COPD: a systematic review
Source: ERJ Open Res 2016
Year: 2016
Effectiveness of community-based self-management interventions among primary care COPD patients: a systematic review
Source: International Congress 2017 – Primary care management of asthma and self-management of respiratory disease
Year: 2017
Do interventions that address health literacy needs improve self-management among people with asthma? A systematic review.
Source: International Congress 2019 – Innovations in primary care assessment and management
Year: 2019
Effect of non-pharmacological interventions on treatment outcomes in COPD patients: Little changes for bigger rewards
Source: International Congress 2019 – Treatment of airway diseases in primary care
Year: 2019
Pharmacists' interventions on clinical asthma outcomes: a systematic review
Source: Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 1134-1143
Year: 2016
Missing data in IPF trials: do not let methodological issues undermine a major therapeutic breakthrough
Source: Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 607-614
Year: 2015
Halotherapy and Covid-19: an oppinion for a possible future prevention approach
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – COVID – 19: treatments and predictive factors
Year: 2021
Psychological and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation
Source: Eur Respir Mon; 2008: 42: 61–73
Year: 2008
Educational interventions for professionals implementing supported self-management: a systematic review from the IMP2ART programme
Source: International Congress 2017 – Primary care management of asthma and self-management of respiratory disease
Year: 2017
Noninvasive strategies in COVID-19: epistemology, randomised trials, guidelines, physiology
Source: Eur Respir J, 57 (2) 2004247; 10.1183/13993003.04247-2020
Year: 2021
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept