e-learning
resources
Amsterdam 2015
Monday, 28.09.2015
How to perform and interpret systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
Introduction to writing a systematic review: the example of the Cochrane Collaboration
Fergus Macbeth (Bristol, United Kingdom)
Source:
International Congress 2015 – How to perform and interpret systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Session:
How to perform and interpret systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Session type:
Symposium
Number:
1721
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
Fergus Macbeth (Bristol, United Kingdom). Introduction to writing a systematic review: the example of the Cochrane Collaboration. International Congress 2015 – How to perform and interpret systematic reviews and meta-analyses
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Panel discussion: Diagnostic tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea in adults and children
Expert interview: Physiological classification of lung function impairment
Occupational exposures to respiratory diseases: A case-based discussion
Related content which might interest you:
How to make sense of a Cochrane systematic review
Source: Breathe 2014; 10:134-144
Year: 2014
Helminths for asthma: Findings of a Cochrane systematic review
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Clinical aspects and treatment of asthma and allergic respiratory diseases
Year: 2012
Telehealthcare interventions for asthma: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in primary care
Year: 2010
Breathing retraining in COPD: A Cochrane review
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - New adjuncts and modalities in pulmonary rehabilitation
Year: 2012
Late Breaking Abstract - Self-management interventions for patients with COPD – a Cochrane review
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – A multidisciplinary approach to the management of chronic respiratory diseases
Year: 2021
Systematic reviews of diagnostic study
Source: Value-Dx event 2019: VALUE-Dx kick off meeting and course
Year: 2019
Book review
Source: ISSN=ISSN 1810-6838, ISBN=, page=313
Year: 2007
Book review
Source: ISSN=ISSN 1810-6838, ISBN=, page=287
Year: 2008
Doing Science: Writing conference abstracts
Source: Breathe 2014; 10: 265-269
Year: 2014
Systematic reviews and meta analysis
Source: ERS Course 2015
Year: 2015
Vitamin D for the management of asthma: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
Source: International Congress 2016 – Asthma management
Year: 2016
Cochrane review update leaves big questions unanswered regarding vaping: implications for medical practitioners
Source: Eur Respir J, 57 (5) 2100022; 10.1183/13993003.00022-2021
Year: 2021
Living with breathlessness: a systematic literature review and thematic synthesis
Source: International Congress 2017 – Primary care management of respiratory symptoms, allergies, inhalers and adherence
Year: 2017
Living with breathlessness: a systematic literature review and qualitative synthesis
Source: Eur Respir J, 51 (2) 1701477; 10.1183/13993003.01477-2017
Year: 2018
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in adults with advanced disease: An updated Cochrane systematic review
Source: International Congress 2016 – Best abstracts on innovative outcomes and novel interventions in respiratory physiotherapy
Year: 2016
Current evidence for COVID-19 therapies: a systematic literature review
Source: Eur Respir Rev, 30 (159) 200384; 10.1183/16000617.0384-2020
Year: 2021
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept