Type III devices – scoring strategies in limited systems

Juan Fernando Masa Jiménez (Cáceres, Spain)

Source: International Congress 2015 – PG16 Sleep and disordered breathing
Session: PG16 Sleep and disordered breathing
Session type: Postgraduate Course
Number: 165

PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcastSlide presentationMultimedia files

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
Juan Fernando Masa Jiménez (Cáceres, Spain). Type III devices – scoring strategies in limited systems. International Congress 2015 – PG16 Sleep and disordered breathing

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
What type of clinical evidence is needed to assess medical devices?
Source: Eur Respir Rev 2016; 25: 259-265
Year: 2016



Exacerbation utilities and durations by type: estimates from Phase III benralizumab studies
Source: International Congress 2017 – Biomarker-based asthma control
Year: 2017


New treatment concepts in stage IV NSCLC: personalized multidisciplinary approaches
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Hot topics in thoracic oncology
Year: 2021


Multicenter study on the variability of the sleep stage scoring algorithm ARTISANA compared to human experts – Part II: validation phase
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 114s
Year: 2005

Device type and real-world effectiveness of combination therapy
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Pharmacological treatment in primary care
Year: 2010

Multicenter study on the variability of a novel sleep stage scoring algorithm compared to human experts – part I: learning phase
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 117s
Year: 2004

Assessment of respiratory muscle strength with two different methods in individuals with Mucopolysacchariosis type VI: a pilot study
Source: International Congress 2017 – Latest insights into pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD
Year: 2017

Prospective evaluation of asthma control using three different classification systems
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Clinical parameters in airway diseases
Year: 2011


Therapeutic options for operated adenocarcinoma patients in stages I or II
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Screening, diagnosis, staging and treatment strategies for lung cancer
Year: 2012

Developing a new ultrasonic method to assess diaphragm movement and comparing the accuracy with existing methods.
Source: International Congress 2017 – Respiratory muscles: evaluation and pathophysiology
Year: 2017


Chronious: A new wearable monitoring system for COPD patients
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Update on monitoring airway diseases
Year: 2011

New clinical research strategies in thoracic oncology: clinical trial design, adaptive, basket and umbrella trials, new end-points and new evaluations of response
Source: Eur Respir Rev 2014; 23: 367-378
Year: 2014



Staging techniques needed for implementing the new staging recommendations 
Source: International Congress 2016 – PG7 New guidelines for the classification and staging of lung cancer
Year: 2016


Are mobile device applications effective at supporting COPD self-management compared to usual care?
Source: International Congress 2019 – M-health/e-health II
Year: 2019


Why are so many treatments effective experimentally? A systems biology approach
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Acute lung injury: challenging old paradigms
Year: 2012


Workshop 1: Lung Clearance Index – demonstration of devices utilised by the core facility; best practices and different approaches to communication with pharmaceutical companies
Source: International Congress 2016 – PD5 Establishing core facilities for measuring clinical trial outcomes 
Year: 2016

Wearable technologies in respiratory functional assessment
Source: ERS webinar 2021: Wearable technologies in respiratory functional assessment
Year: 2021