What could we learn from ongoing therapeutic trials?

David Planchard (Roussy-Villejuif, France)

Source: ERS Research Seminar
Number: 12

PDF journal article, handout or slidesSlide presentation

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
David Planchard (Roussy-Villejuif, France). What could we learn from ongoing therapeutic trials?. ERS Research Seminar

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Do we have enough evidence overall, or should we wait for ongoing trials?
Source: International Congress 2014 – From respiratory infections to wheezing: reevaluating the role of vitamin D levels in childhood
Year: 2014



Efficacy and safety of new drugs for M/XDR-TB: what have we learned from observational studies?
Source: International Congress 2019 – Recent developments and future perspectives in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
Year: 2019


The future of translational lung cancer research: from classical randomised controlled trials to innovative platform trials
Source: International Congress 2018 – New drugs, strategies and research designs for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Year: 2018


What have we learn from rebiospy studies?
Source: ERS Research Seminar
Year: 2015


Do the current endpoints in IPF clinical trials allow good regulatory decisions to be made?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Ceremony for the ERS Rare Pulmonary Disease Research Award 2014 followed by the symposium "Challenges in endpoints for rare lung diseases"
Year: 2014



How to accelerate bringing new drugs to patients: role of clinical trials networks
Source: International Congress 2019 – Rare lung diseases
Year: 2019


New clinical research strategies in thoracic oncology: clinical trial design, adaptive, basket and umbrella trials, new end-points and new evaluations of response
Source: Eur Respir Rev 2014; 23: 367-378
Year: 2014



Negative clinical trials in sarcoidosis: failed therapies or flawed study design?
Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1123-1126
Year: 2014


From the bedside: upcoming new clinical strategies
Source: International Congress 2016 – Scientific Year in Review 2016
Year: 2016


Pirfenidone: an update on clinical trial data and insights from everyday practice
Source: Eur Respir Rev 2014; 23: 111-117
Year: 2014



How to treat IPF: lessons from the NIH-IPF-Net treatment trials
Source: International Congress 2014 – Ceremony for the ERS Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Research Award 2014 - Hot Topic: "Understanding and treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in the 21st century"
Year: 2014



Who should receive which biologic and why? Current and future approaches in severe asthma patients
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Linking scientific mechanisms to recent clinical therapeutic advances in airway disease: why, who, when and what?
Year: 2021


Lots of promising targets and biomarkers, but how can we deliver the next generation of severe asthma trials?
Source: International Congress 2019 – Beyond T2 mechanisms in asthma: who are the other players?
Year: 2019


Large trials, new knowledge: the changing face of COPD management
Source: Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 1692-1703
Year: 2015




Clinical trial landscape for M/XDR-TB: current evidence and future perspectives
Source: International Congress 2019 – Recent developments and future perspectives in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
Year: 2019


Are we wasting money on premature and badly designed clinical trials?
Source: International Congress 2015 – Acute lung injury research: are we doing the right things?
Year: 2015



Randomised controlled trials and real-life studies: two answers for one question
Source: Eur Respir Rev, 27 (149) 180080; 10.1183/16000617.0080-2018
Year: 2018



A new model for clinical trials to address the COVID-19 emergency
Source: Breathe, 16 (2) 200220; 10.1183/20734735.0220-2020
Year: 2020



Was the implementation strategy of the ProACT trial adequately proactive?
Source: Breathe, 15 (1) 77; 10.1183/20734735.0338-2018
Year: 2019