Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Good quality clinical recommendations for thoracic malignancy management in Europe
Disease area: Thoracic oncology



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
M. Paesmans (Brussels, Belgium). Published literature and guidelines in thoracic oncology: what is worth reading?. Annual Congress 2012 - Good quality clinical recommendations for thoracic malignancy management in Europe

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Proposed new pulmonary hypertension definition: is 4 mm(Hg) worth re-writing medical textbooks? Source: Eur Respir J, 53 (3) 1900197; 10.1183/13993003.00197-2019 Year: 2019 Challenges and controversies in thoracic oncology: a new ERJ series Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 1571-1572 Year: 2014 Expanding the spectrum of European Respiratory Society official scientific documents: short documents complement clinical practice guidelines, statements and technical standards Source: Eur Respir J, 55 (6) 2001030; 10.1183/13993003.01030-2020 Year: 2020 Thoracic oncology HERMES: European curriculum recommendations for training in thoracic oncology Source: Breathe 2016; 12: 249-255 Year: 2016 The best papers in the ERJ: clinical practice Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – The best of the European Respiratory Journal 2021 Year: 2021 Cough clinical practice guidelines: A critical review of scientific evidence and recommendations Source: International Congress 2016 – Epidemiological and clinical data regarding the modern management of chronic lung diseases Year: 2016 Thoracic oncology, this journal club will explore a major randomised trial in mesothelioma treatment, implications for practice and the strengths and weaknesses of the study in the context of the published data Source: Journal Club 2022 Year: 2022 Improving tumour documentation in thoracic oncology: what can we learn from each other? Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Good quality clinical recommendations for thoracic malignancy management in Europe Year: 2012 Cochrane review update leaves big questions unanswered regarding vaping: implications for medical practitioners Source: Eur Respir J, 57 (5) 2100022; 10.1183/13993003.00022-2021 Year: 2021 National and local care in thoracic oncology: does Europe speak the same language? Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Good quality clinical recommendations for thoracic malignancy management in Europe Year: 2012 Current practice: safety checklists for pleural procedures Source: International Congress 2017 – Pleural interventions and transthoracic ultrasound (TUS) Year: 2017 Multidisciplinary questions in thoracic oncology: the team experience Source: Eur Respir J 2016; 48: 626-627 Year: 2016 COVID-19 and COPD: a narrative review of the basic science and clinical outcomes Source: Eur Respir Rev, 29 (158) 200199; 10.1183/16000617.0199-2020 Year: 2020 Quality management in thoracic oncology: how do patients and clinicians benefit? Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Good quality clinical recommendations for thoracic malignancy management in Europe Year: 2012 Reviewing recent research on peer review: myths and reality Source: Annual Congress 2011 - BMJ/ERJ Symposium – Peer reviewing Year: 2011 Current evidence for COVID-19 therapies: a systematic literature review Source: Eur Respir Rev, 30 (159) 200384; 10.1183/16000617.0384-2020 Year: 2021 The impact of therapeutics on mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analyses informing the European Respiratory Society living guideline Source: Eur Respir Rev, 30 (162) 210171; 10.1183/16000617.0171-2021 Year: 2021