e-learning
resources
Vienna 2012
Tuesday, 04.09.2012
Pro/Con Debate "Cost-effectiveness of maintenance chemotherapy for NSCLC"
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
PRO: maintenance is cost-effective
R. Pirker (Vienna, Austria)
Source:
Annual Congress 2012 - Pro/Con Debate "Cost-effectiveness of maintenance chemotherapy for NSCLC"
Session:
Pro/Con Debate "Cost-effectiveness of maintenance chemotherapy for NSCLC"
Session type:
Symposium
Number:
4233
Disease area:
Thoracic oncology
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
R. Pirker (Vienna, Austria). PRO: maintenance is cost-effective. Annual Congress 2012 - Pro/Con Debate "Cost-effectiveness of maintenance chemotherapy for NSCLC"
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy versus palliative care survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma
Lung function assessment in octogenarians with lung cancer diagnosis
Home-based telerehabilitation program using real-time monitoring and interactive exercise for patient with lung cancer: A feasibility study
Related content which might interest you:
PRO recommendation
Source: ERS Course 2018 - Noninvasive ventilation: advanced
Year: 2018
CON: maintenance is not cost-effective
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Pro/Con Debate "Cost-effectiveness of maintenance chemotherapy for NSCLC"
Year: 2012
From kitchen table questionnaires to valid PRO: how PRO's can provide insight in clinical events, the EXACT-PRO example
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - An ERS/ELF joint session "New tools to assess improvement in respiratory patients: capturing the patient's perspective"
Year: 2012
Use of antifibrotics in post-COVID ILD: PRO
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Post COVID interstitial lung diseases syndrome: diagnosis and management as interstitial lung disease?
Year: 2021
PRO: Severity scores are useful
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Pro-Con Debate "Severe community-acquired pneumonia: a lung disease?"
Year: 2012
Is there a place for oral mucolytics in the prevention of LRTI? - PRO
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - PG1 EU GRACE Network Full-day Course: vaccination and preventive measures for LRTIs in the community: what’s new?
Year: 2009
PRO - Steroids in ARDS
Source: Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation Conference 2020
Year: 2020
Long term application of NIV in COPD - PRO & CON
Source: ERS course 2015
Year: 2015
Debate: Antibiotic treatment is contraindicated in acute bronchitis - PRO
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - PG1 - EU GRACE network full-day course: Antibiotics or not: from acute bronchitis to acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis
Year: 2008
NIV and pneumonia - PRO & CON
Source: ERS course 2015
Year: 2015
Four-month regimens: are they feasible?
Source: International Congress 2015 – Tuberculosis: short-course chemotherapy
Year: 2015
Indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) reduces days with COPD exacerbation vs salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) independent of PRO tool: results of the FLAME study
Source: International Congress 2017 – Bronchodilators and bronchoprotectors
Year: 2017
Asthma control: which tools are feasible in primary care?
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Primary Care Programme "Asthma management in clinical practice"
Year: 2013
Analysis of the patient-reported outcome (PRO) endpoints found in labeling claims of asthma drugs in Europe
Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 193s
Year: 2007
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept