e-learning
resources
Amsterdam 2011
Sunday, 25.09.2011
BMJ/ERJ Symposium – Peer reviewing
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
Reviewing recent research on peer review: myths and reality
W. Weber (London, United Kingdom)
Source:
Annual Congress 2011 - BMJ/ERJ Symposium – Peer reviewing
Session:
BMJ/ERJ Symposium – Peer reviewing
Session type:
Symposium
Number:
1344
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
W. Weber (London, United Kingdom). Reviewing recent research on peer review: myths and reality. Annual Congress 2011 - BMJ/ERJ Symposium – Peer reviewing
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Panel discussion on Basic translational and clinical research – building a career in paediatric pulmonology- experiences from clinicians in lower middle income countries
ERS/EAACI statement on severe exacerbations in asthma in adults: facts, priorities and key research questions
Definition and history of sarcoidosis
Related content which might interest you:
Effectively publishing scientific work - moderated discussion
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – How to effectively publish scientific work?
Year: 2021
How to write a peer review
Source: ERS Lung Science Conference 2021
Year: 2021
COVID-19 and COPD: a narrative review of the basic science and clinical outcomes
Source: Eur Respir Rev, 29 (158) 200199; 10.1183/16000617.0199-2020
Year: 2020
Cochrane review update leaves big questions unanswered regarding vaping: implications for medical practitioners
Source: Eur Respir J, 57 (5) 2100022; 10.1183/13993003.00022-2021
Year: 2021
Doing science: how to get credit for your scientific work
Source: Breathe 2015; 11:153-155
Year: 2015
Empowering children with asthma: a framework for clinical practice based on a qualitative literature review
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Risk factors, comorbidities and remote monitoring in childhood asthma
Year: 2020
How to present a scientific paper at a conference
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - PG22 - Writing and presenting scientific work at meetings: an interactive, hands-on course
Year: 2007
Artificial intelligence techniques in asthma: a systematic review and critical appraisal of the existing literature
Source: Eur Respir J, 56 (3) 2000521; 10.1183/13993003.00521-2020
Year: 2020
Current evidence for COVID-19 therapies: a systematic literature review
Source: Eur Respir Rev, 30 (159) 200384; 10.1183/16000617.0384-2020
Year: 2021
Writing research
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Lunchtime Programme "How to get your paper published?"
Year: 2009
Doing Science: managing colleagues and collaborations in scientific research
Source: Breathe 2015; 11:77-79
Year: 2015
Digital medical conference attendees’ reasons for attendance and ideas for conference improvement: results of an international survey
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Innovation in respiratory training
Year: 2021
Palliative and end of life care conversations in COPD - a systematic literature review
Source: International Congress 2017 – Best abstracts in physical activity and management of COPD
Year: 2017
Cough clinical practice guidelines: A critical review of scientific evidence and recommendations
Source: International Congress 2016 – Epidemiological and clinical data regarding the modern management of chronic lung diseases
Year: 2016
The use of Pre-prints to publish your science
Source: ERS Lung Science Conference 2021
Year: 2021
Is the current publishing and funding environment ruining our research?
Source: International Congress 2015 – Acute lung injury research: are we doing the right things?
Year: 2015
Palliative and end-of-life care conversations in COPD: a systematic literature review
Source: ERJ Open Res, 3 (2) 00068-2016; 10.1183/23120541.00068-2016
Year: 2017
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept