Reviewing recent research on peer review: myths and reality

W. Weber (London, United Kingdom)

Source: Annual Congress 2011 - BMJ/ERJ Symposium – Peer reviewing
Session: BMJ/ERJ Symposium – Peer reviewing
Session type: Symposium
Number: 1344

Slide presentation

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
W. Weber (London, United Kingdom). Reviewing recent research on peer review: myths and reality. Annual Congress 2011 - BMJ/ERJ Symposium – Peer reviewing

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Effectively publishing scientific work - moderated discussion
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – How to effectively publish scientific work?
Year: 2021


How to write a peer review
Source: ERS Lung Science Conference 2021
Year: 2021


COVID-19 and COPD: a narrative review of the basic science and clinical outcomes
Source: Eur Respir Rev, 29 (158) 200199; 10.1183/16000617.0199-2020
Year: 2020



Cochrane review update leaves big questions unanswered regarding vaping: implications for medical practitioners
Source: Eur Respir J, 57 (5) 2100022; 10.1183/13993003.00022-2021
Year: 2021



Doing science: how to get credit for your scientific work
Source: Breathe 2015; 11:153-155
Year: 2015


Empowering children with asthma: a framework for clinical practice based on a qualitative literature review
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Risk factors, comorbidities and remote monitoring in childhood asthma
Year: 2020


How to present a scientific paper at a conference
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - PG22 - Writing and presenting scientific work at meetings: an interactive, hands-on course
Year: 2007



Artificial intelligence techniques in asthma: a systematic review and critical appraisal of the existing literature
Source: Eur Respir J, 56 (3) 2000521; 10.1183/13993003.00521-2020
Year: 2020



Current evidence for COVID-19 therapies: a systematic literature review
Source: Eur Respir Rev, 30 (159) 200384; 10.1183/16000617.0384-2020
Year: 2021



Writing research
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Lunchtime Programme "How to get your paper published?"
Year: 2009


Doing Science: managing colleagues and collaborations in scientific research
Source: Breathe 2015; 11:77-79
Year: 2015


Digital medical conference attendees’ reasons for attendance and ideas for conference improvement: results of an international survey
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Innovation in respiratory training
Year: 2021



Palliative and end of life care conversations in COPD - a systematic literature review
Source: International Congress 2017 – Best abstracts in physical activity and management of COPD
Year: 2017


Cough clinical practice guidelines: A critical review of scientific evidence and recommendations
Source: International Congress 2016 – Epidemiological and clinical data regarding the modern management of chronic lung diseases
Year: 2016


The use of Pre-prints to publish your science
Source: ERS Lung Science Conference 2021
Year: 2021


Is the current publishing and funding environment ruining our research?
Source: International Congress 2015 – Acute lung injury research: are we doing the right things?
Year: 2015



Palliative and end-of-life care conversations in COPD: a systematic literature review
Source: ERJ Open Res, 3 (2) 00068-2016; 10.1183/23120541.00068-2016
Year: 2017