The FEF25-75 /FVC ratio is related to exercise responsiveness in asthmatic children Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 119s Year: 2001
Comparison of FEV1 and PEF values in cough variant asthma during methacholine challenge test Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Cough, airway hyperresponsiveness and asthma control Year: 2010
FEF25-75% should not yet be used to define a bronchodilator response in individuals Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Spirometry - now and in the future Year: 2005
Maximally attained level of FEV1 and FEV1 decline determine airway hyperresponsiveness in adults Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 17s Year: 2003
IsovolumeFEF25-75% 6 and FEV1 for identifying bronchodilator response Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 156s Year: 2006
Can the interrupter resistance be used to measure airway hyperresponsiveness during the methacholine challenge test as a substitute for FEV1? Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – New insights into lung function testing Year: 2021
Assessment of the relationship between FEF25-75/FVC ratio and reversibility in COPD Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 810s Year: 2006
How often FEV1 underestimates bronchodilator response? Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 100s Year: 2003
FEV6 and FEV1/FEV6 have higher association with small airway function and oxygen saturation than FVC and FEV1/FVC in patients with asthma. Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Lung function tests and exhaled biomarkers Year: 2020
The influence of FVC manoeuvres on consecutive FEV1 values during methacholine challenge Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 587s Year: 2004
Methacholine challenges for detection of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) – a comparison of forced spirometry and body plethysmography Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Airway hyperresponsiveness: mechanism and assessment Year: 2009
sGaw as an alternative for FEV1 in the measurement of airway responsiveness to methacholine in patients experiencing chronic cough Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Lung function today and tomorrow I Year: 2011
Assessment of a 20% fall in FEF25-75% in patients with negative methacholine provocation test Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Asthma: growing understanding of influential factors Year: 2008
Ratio between forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of VC and FVC as a determinant of airway reactivity and sensitivity to methacholine Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 219s Year: 2006
Comparison of bronchodilatator response of FEV1 and airway resistance Source: Annual Congress 2003 - Assessing airway function: practicalities and clinical applications Year: 2003
FEV1 and respiratory resistance response to methacholine in children calculated from between-measurement variability Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 43s Year: 2005
How to interpret reduced forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/vital capacity ratio with normal FEV1 Source: Eur Respir J 2009; 33: 1396-1402 Year: 2009
Methacholine challenge test with impulse oscillometry versus spirometry: which is more sensitive in detecting airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR?) Source: International Congress 2018 – Clinical and functional monitoring in airway disease Year: 2018
A comparison of the response to inhaled histamine measured with FEV1 and sGaw in healthy subjects Source: Annual Congress 2003 - Assessing airway function: practicalities and clinical applications Year: 2003
Normal lung function and absence of bronchodilator response in children with stable, controlled asthma using inhaled corticosteroids Source: Annual Congress 2006 - New features of paediatric asthma Year: 2006