A method of selecting most significant biochemical parameters in a given clinical setting in COVID-19

S. Purohit Joshi (Jaipur, India), A. Sinha (Hyderabad, India), H. Mishra (Jaipur, India), P. Rijhwani (Jaipur, India), R. Sarkar (London, United Kingdom), P. Sekhar Das (Bangalore, India), S. Jana (Hyderabad, India)

Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Burden and epidemiology of COVID-19
Session: Burden and epidemiology of COVID-19
Session type: E-poster
Number: 931

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
S. Purohit Joshi (Jaipur, India), A. Sinha (Hyderabad, India), H. Mishra (Jaipur, India), P. Rijhwani (Jaipur, India), R. Sarkar (London, United Kingdom), P. Sekhar Das (Bangalore, India), S. Jana (Hyderabad, India). A method of selecting most significant biochemical parameters in a given clinical setting in COVID-19. 931

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
The prognostic significance of different clinical, radiological and laboratory parameters in sarcoidosis
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 46s
Year: 2003

The clinical value of bodybox measurements
Source: International Congress 2015 – CC5 Interpretation of pulmonary function testing
Year: 2015



The best cut-off value in predicting intensive care in the rapid response system: The preliminary study
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Clinical problems associated with cough, pleura and respiratory health status
Year: 2021


What requirements should a biomarker meet to be used in the clinical and epidemiological setting?
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Biomarkers in COPD - application in clinical and epidemiological studies
Year: 2008


A simple algorithm for the identification of clinical COPD phenotypes
Source: Eur Respir J, 50 (5) 1701034; 10.1183/13993003.01034-2017
Year: 2017



A basic prediction model with clinical parameters to diagnose lung cancer.
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Screening, diagnosis, management and prognosis of lung cancer
Year: 2021


The prognostic value of some clinical and laboratory parameters in sarcoidosis
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 434s
Year: 2002

Comparison of morphological and densitometric indicators of the inflammatory process activity for substantiation of the optimal terms of surgical treatment in patients with various forms of TB
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Thoracic surgery: developments in diagnostics and outcomes
Year: 2020


Applications of clinical exercise testing: different formats, different prognostic outcomes
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –PG14 Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the evaluation of patients with respiratory diseases
Year: 2013



Applications of clinical exercise testing: different formats, different prognostic outcomes
Source: International Congress 2014 – PG07 Cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Year: 2014




A critical evaluation of the relevance of different asthma phenotypes for clinical practice
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - A step-change in asthma. The Lancet/ERS symposium
Year: 2008


Workstation 3 - Spirometry - how to perform a spirometic test, implementing safety measures, selecting the best values and simulating errors
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Educational skills workshop 7: Spirometry knowledge and basic skills (European spirometry training programme)
Year: 2013

Evaluation of factors to consider prior to adjustment of biologic quality control ranges using data from a large multi-centre clinical trial
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Quality control in lung function and new developments
Year: 2009


Do the current endpoints in IPF clinical trials allow good regulatory decisions to be made?
Source: International Congress 2014 – Ceremony for the ERS Rare Pulmonary Disease Research Award 2014 followed by the symposium "Challenges in endpoints for rare lung diseases"
Year: 2014



Evaluation of a method for establishing biologic quality control ranges from the first 20 acceptable test sessions in a large multi-center study
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Quality control in lung function and new developments
Year: 2009


Workstation 2 – Spirometry: performing the test, safety measures, selecting the best values and simulating errors
Source: International Congress 2014 – EW9 Spirometry knowledge and basic skills (European spirometry training programme)
Year: 2014

Workstation 2 – Spirometry: performing the test, safety measures, selecting the best values and simulating errors
Source: International Congress 2014 – EW8 Spirometry knowledge and basic skills (European spirometry training programme)
Year: 2014

The clinical value of trend reports in pulmonary function testing
Source: International Congress 2015 – CC5 Interpretation of pulmonary function testing
Year: 2015



Is pathological response a valid surrogate for outcome?
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Hot topics in thoracic oncology
Year: 2021


Overall clinical approach
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – ERS Clinical practice guidelines for managing children and adolescents with bronchiectasis
Year: 2021