Source: Eur Respir J, 56 (6) 2000603; 10.1183/13993003.00603-2020
Disease area: Airway diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
Nilakash Das, Kenneth Verstraete, Sanja Stanojevic, Marko Topalovic, Jean-Marie Aerts, Wim Janssens. Deep-learning algorithm helps to standardise ATS/ERS spirometric acceptability and usability criteria. Eur Respir J, 56 (6) 2000603; 10.1183/13993003.00603-2020

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Does feedback improve compliance to the ATS/ERS 2005 acceptability criteria in our lung function laboratory? Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry! Year: 2008 Adherence to acceptability and reproducibility criteria for spirometry in complex lung function laboratories Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 280s Year: 2006 Adeherence to spirometry reproducibility guidelines – a re-audit Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry! Year: 2008 ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests Source: Guideline 2021 Year: 2021 Comparison between results of spirometry performed with the ATS/ERS quantitative criteria and simple visual inspection criteria Source: International Congress 2017 – Best abstracts in lung function Year: 2017 Laboratory compliance with published acceptability criteria for spirometry and influencing factors Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 280s Year: 2006 Impact of incorporating the evaluation of full inflation recommended in the 2019 spirometry standards on the evaluation of spirometry acceptability Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – New insights into lung function testing Year: 2021 Quality control of spirometry in children: Can ERS/ATS criteria replace visual inspection? Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Advances in lung function testing from infancy to adulthood Year: 2011 Spirometry training does not guarantee valid results Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Spirometry - now and in the future Year: 2005 Simply the best: the 2004 ERS/ATS web guidelines for management of COPD Source: ISSN=ISSN 1810-6838, ISBN=, page=11 Year: 2004 Impact on spirometry quality results when using 2005 or 2019 ATS/ERS guidelines Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Future advances in respiratory physiology Year: 2021 An assessment of physicians knowledge of the GINA guidelines Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Medical education Year: 2011 Number of tests and the time needed to fulfil the quality criteria for plethysmographic measurements Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Quality control in lung function and exercise-related issues Year: 2011 Definition, epidemiology and diagnostic criteria of IPF and how these guidelines were developed Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence based guidelines and recommendations for clinical management - Results of the joint ATS/ERS/JRS taskforce Year: 2009 International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 343-373 Year: 2013 International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma Source: ERS Webinar 2020: International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma Year: 2020 Developing joint ERS/ATS documents Source: International Congress 2017 – Making ERS guidelines usable and relatable Year: 2017 Guideline methodology in the ERS/ATS COPD exacerbation guidelines Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Recommendations from the ERS/ATS Guideline on COPD Exacerbation Prevention Year: 2013 Updated ATS/ERS Technical Standard on spirometry Source: International Congress 2019 – New insights into quality control of lung function testing Year: 2019