Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical parameters in severe asthma
Disease area: Airway diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
J. Lanario (Plymouth, United Kingdom), R. Jones (Plymouth, United Kingdom), M. Hyland (Plymouth, United Kingdom), A. Menzies-Gow (London, United Kingdom), A. Mansur (Birmingham, United Kingdom), J. Dodd (Bristol, United Kingdom), S. Fowler (Manchester, United Kingdom), M. Patel (Plymouth, United Kingdom), G. Hayes (Plymouth, United Kingdom), M. Masoli (Exeter, United Kingdom). Is the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) fit for purpose? A planned study using the SAQ. 2241

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Minimal clinically important difference of the clinical COPD questionnaire Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 689s Year: 2004 Minimal clinically important difference for asthma endpoints: an expert consensus report Source: Eur Respir Rev, 29 (156) 190137; 10.1183/16000617.0137-2019 Year: 2020 Minimal clinically important differences for Dyspnea-12 and MDP scores are similar at 2 weeks and 6 months: follow-up of a longitudinal clinical study Source: Eur Respir J, 57 (3) 2002823; 10.1183/13993003.02823-2020 Year: 2021 Is the CURB65 score fit for purpose - a retrospective analysis Source: International Congress 2017 – CAP: severity scores, risk groups and biomarkers Year: 2017 The minimal clinically important difference for COPD health status tools measured with global ratings of change during different time periods Source: International Congress 2016 – Managing multimorbidity and lifestyle change in primary care Year: 2016 Which method is effective in patient with asthma to guide the treatment? (2 year follow-up study) Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Quality of treatment in primary respiratory care Year: 2009 The Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ) - minimal clinically important difference and sensitivity to change Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): easy tools in the management of chronic respiratory diseases Year: 2021 A questionnaire specifically designed for Italian patients affected by COPD. Criteria to choice the optimal number of items using simple logistic models Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 56s Year: 2003 The development of an instrument to assess the needs of people with COPD: a Delphi study Source: International Congress 2018 – The many facets of respiratory nursing Year: 2018 The incremental shuttle walk test (ISW) in patients with bronchiectasis: Response to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) Source: International Congress 2019 – Hot topics in pulmonary rehabilitation Year: 2019 Evaluation of a method for establishing biologic quality control ranges from the first 20 acceptable test sessions in a large multi-center study Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Quality control in lung function and new developments Year: 2009 The EQ5D5L in COPD: Validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference (MID) Source: International Congress 2015 – Latest insights into pulmonary rehabilitation Year: 2015 Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of K-BILD and SGRQ-I Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical aspects of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Year: 2020 Comprehensive comparison of the repeatability of the most commonly employed tests of exercise performance for patients with stable COPD.  An observational study. Source: International Congress 2018 – Let’s interact and discuss the hot topics in pulmonary rehabilitation Year: 2018 DES-OSA PLUS- a validation study and improvement of the score Source: International Congress 2018 – Diagnostics including questionnaires Year: 2018 Could step and stepper tests be valid to assessing the exercise and functional capacities in patients with COPD? Results from a systematic review. Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Tapas of respiratory physiotherapy Year: 2020 Monitoring quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic bronchoscopic intervention: a pilot study Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 430s Year: 2003 Minimal important difference for the asthma control questionnaire Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 460s Year: 2004 Asthma cost-effectiveness analyses: Are we using the recommended outcomes in estimating value? Source: International Congress 2017 – Primary care management of asthma and self-management of respiratory disease Year: 2017 Development and pilot testing of a new 7-item cough severity patient reported outcome measure Source: Annual Congress 2008 - COPD epidemiology Year: 2008