Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Respiratory physiology and sleep: new approaches to diagnosis and treatment
Disease area: Paediatric lung diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
F. Wyler (Bern, Switzerland), M. Oestreich (Bern, Switzerland), K. Ramsey (Bern, Switzerland), P. Latzin (Bern, Switzerland). Outcome differences in multiple-breath washout devices are explained primarily by sensor characteristics. 1171

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Leaks during multiple-breath washout: characterisation and influence on outcomes Source: ERJ Open Res, 4 (1) 00012-2017; 10.1183/23120541.00012-2017 Year: 2018 Comparison of measures of ventilation heterogeneity derived from multiple breath inert gas washout Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Pathophysiological mechanisms in disease: new insights Year: 2012 Comparison of different analysis algorithms to calculate multiple-breath washout outcomes Source: ERJ Open Res, 4 (3) 00021-2017; 10.1183/23120541.00021-2017 Year: 2018 Correction of measurement error in a commercial multiple-breath washout device Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Respiratory physiology and breathing during sleep in health and sickness Year: 2021 Modifications to a photoacoustic gas analyser increases accuracy of functional residual capacity measurements by multiple breath washout of SF6 in an infant lung model Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Clinical applications of ventilatory function tests in paediatric pulmonology Year: 2008 In vitro and in vivo functional residual capacity comparisons between multiple-breath nitrogen washout devices Source: ERJ Open Res, 3 (4) 00011-2017; 10.1183/23120541.00011-2017 Year: 2017 Simultaneous sulfur hexafluoride and nitrogen multiple-breath washout (MBW) to examine inherent differences in MBW outcomes Source: ERJ Open Res, 5 (4) 00234-2018; 10.1183/23120541.00234-2018 Year: 2019 Consistency of aerosol characteristics at low flow rates for a novel mesh nebulizer Source: International Congress 2018 – Pulmonary drug delivery: inhaler use, devices and technologies Year: 2018 Errors in measured open circuit TLCO caused by simulated inhomogeneity of ventilation and diffusion Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 86s Year: 2003 Improving MBW testing: Closed circuit washin with a novel bolus gas delivery reduces washin time and does not alter washout Source: International Congress 2014 – Lung function testing: new findings and new approaches Year: 2014 Multiple-breath gas washout with hyperpolarized ³He MRI: Combining ventilation images with functional data Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Lung imaging Year: 2010 Outcome of multiple breath washout (MBW) in healthy children using two different gases (N2 and SF6) with the same equipment Source: International Congress 2017 – What is new in respiratory and sleep physiology? Year: 2017 Consensus statement for inert gas washout measurement using multiple- and single- breath tests Source: Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 507-522 Year: 2013 Impact of leakage on external flow measurement in non-invasive ventilation Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Recent technical developments in long-term noninvasive ventilation Year: 2012 Improved reliability of spirometry and diffusion measurements by pneumotachograph compared to mass-flow sensor Source: International Congress 2014 – Respiratory function at rest and during exercise Year: 2014 Validation study of the AirGo™ device for continuous monitoring of respiratory function Source: International Congress 2018 – New methods and concepts in tests of lung and respiratory muscle function Year: 2018 Multiple breath washout (MBW) for assessment of functional residual capacity (FRC) using an ultrasonic flowmeter - a pilot study Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 383s Year: 2003 Comparison of biological and nonbiological quality control methods for assessing interlaboratory differences in TLCO and VA measurements Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 145s Year: 2003 Measurement of respiratory function with a mobile application: comparison with a conventional spirometer and evaluation of usability Source: International Congress 2019 – M-health/e-health I Year: 2019