Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Epidemiology of COPD
Disease area: Airway diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
S. Chinn, T. Gislason (London, United Kingdom; Reykjavik, Iceland). Advantages of FEV₁/height² and FEV₁/height³ over percentage predicted value. Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 3678

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Comparison of predicted lung function values estimating height from alternative methods Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Beyond spirometry: the skills behind lung function testing Year: 2008 Effect of different positive cut-off values on T-spot.TB results Source: Annual Congress 2009 - From bench to bedside: diagnosis of tuberculosis Year: 2009 FEV1/FVC expressed as an absolute value or % predicted, which is better as criterium for detecting airway obstruction; receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis Source: Annual Congress 2004 - Clinical physiology: airways and vessels Year: 2004 Limitations of calculating “true” regression slope: impact on estimates of minimal important difference Source: Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 1296-1297 Year: 2011 Exercise testing to predict lung cancer surgery outcome: which is better - percentage of predicted VO2 or absolute value? Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 672s Year: 2004 Feasibility and reliability of ulna length measurements in calculating predicted lung function values in children Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 180s Year: 2005 Comparison of different predicted and lower limit of normal (LLN) values in ventilation disorders detection Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Predicting the future: the impact of reference values on a range of respiratory paramaters Year: 2012 Armspan replacing height to reach spirometric reference values Source: International Congress 2018 – New methods and concepts in tests of lung and respiratory muscle function Year: 2018 Impact of the body mass index on the FEV1 value and its mean yearly decline in COPD patients Source: Annual Congress 2007 - COPD and comorbidity Year: 2007 Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations Source: Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 1324-1343 Year: 2012 Differences between % predicted and z-score. The impact on severity classification in spirometry. Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Quality improvements in lung function and sleep diagnostics Year: 2020 Predicted values of VO2max in relation to maximum workload Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Quality, sleep and exercise - the ingredients for a perfect life! Year: 2007 Measuring improvement in dyspnoea: should absolute or relative values be used? Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1700-1703 Year: 2014 Effect of reporting two versus three trials on lung clearance index values Source: International Congress 2017 – What is the future for paediatric respiratory physiology and sleep? Year: 2017 The predictive value of baseline spirometry values and reversibility history of the patient for a significant reversibility response in children Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 539s Year: 2002 The largest occlusion time in maximum inspiratory pressure measurements in patients under mechanical ventilation can determine higher values to those calculated by the predictive formula: croos sectional study? Source: International Congress 2018 – Acutely hospitalised patients: physiotherapy interventions and assessment methods Year: 2018 The value of FENO50 measurement in COPD – results from the TIE-study Source: International Congress 2017 – Current challenges in COPD evaluation Year: 2017 Absolute values of lung function explain the sex difference in breathlessness in the general population Source: Eur Respir J, 49 (5) 1602047; 10.1183/13993003.02047-2016 Year: 2017 Not the mean value of peak inspiratory flow (PIF), but the number of patients who are able to gain minimal and/or optimal peak inspiratory flow with resistence represented dry powder inhaler, is the proper measure of its utility Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 241s Year: 2001