Minimal clinically important difference for asthma endpoints: an expert consensus report

Matteo Bonini, Marcello Di Paolo, Diego Bagnasco, Ilaria Baiardini, Fulvio Braido, Marco Caminati, Elisiana Carpagnano, Marco Contoli, Angelo Corsico, Stefano Del Giacco, Enrico Heffler, Carlo Lombardi, Ilaria Menichini, Manlio Milanese, Nicola Scichilone, Gianenrico Senna, Giorgio W. Canonica

Source: Eur Respir Rev, 29 (156) 190137; 10.1183/16000617.0137-2019
Journal Issue: June
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstractFull text journal articlePDF journal article, handout or slides

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
Matteo Bonini, Marcello Di Paolo, Diego Bagnasco, Ilaria Baiardini, Fulvio Braido, Marco Caminati, Elisiana Carpagnano, Marco Contoli, Angelo Corsico, Stefano Del Giacco, Enrico Heffler, Carlo Lombardi, Ilaria Menichini, Manlio Milanese, Nicola Scichilone, Gianenrico Senna, Giorgio W. Canonica. Minimal clinically important difference for asthma endpoints: an expert consensus report. Eur Respir Rev, 29 (156) 190137; 10.1183/16000617.0137-2019

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Minimal clinically important difference of the clinical COPD questionnaire
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 689s
Year: 2004

Minimal clinically important difference of the Brief-BESTest in COPD
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation: part 1
Year: 2020


Minimal important difference of change in patient-specific goals in severe emphysema patients
Source: ERJ Open Res, 6 (4) 00459-2020; 10.1183/23120541.00459-2020
Year: 2020



Minimal important difference for the asthma control questionnaire
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 460s
Year: 2004

Clinically relevant differences in COPD health status: systematic review and triangulation
Source: Eur Respir J, 52 (3) 1800412; 10.1183/13993003.00412-2018
Year: 2018



Clinically relevant differences in COPD health status: systematic review and triangulation
Source: International Congress 2018 – Epidemiology of COPD : from exarcebations and comorbidities to asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS)
Year: 2018


Defining high probability of an asthma diagnosis in primary care: results from an expert consensus workshop
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Diagnosis and management of airways disease in primary care
Year: 2020


Pulmonary exacerbations in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia: an expert consensus definition for use in clinical trials
Source: ERJ Open Res, 5 (1) 00147-2018; 10.1183/23120541.00147-2018
Year: 2019



Different definitions in childhood asthma: how dependable is the dependent variable?
Source: Eur Respir J 2010; 36: 48-56
Year: 2010



The expert patient: towards a novel definition
Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 853-857
Year: 2014


The minimal clinically important difference for COPD health status tools measured with global ratings of change during different time periods
Source: International Congress 2016 – Managing multimorbidity and lifestyle change in primary care
Year: 2016


The association between adherence and outcomes in severe asthma: a systematic review
Source: International Congress 2019 – Long-term evaluation and control of airway diseases
Year: 2019


Definition of COPD: based on evidence or opinion?
Source: Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 681-682
Year: 2008


The Severe Asthma Questionnaire: sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference
Source: Eur Respir J, 57 (6) 2100300; 10.1183/13993003.00300-2021
Year: 2021



Cough clinical practice guidelines: A critical review of scientific evidence and recommendations
Source: International Congress 2016 – Epidemiological and clinical data regarding the modern management of chronic lung diseases
Year: 2016


The critical statement of the asthma expert
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Endo meets obstruction: the new endoscopic treatment options for obstructive lung diseases
Year: 2012


Pulmonary exacerbation in adults with bronchiectasis: a consensus definition for clinical research
Source: Eur Respir J, 49 (6) 1700051; 10.1183/13993003.00051-2017
Year: 2017



Explaining chronic breathlessness: international expert consensus
Source: International Congress 2019 – Hot topics in assessment and care for chronic lung diseases
Year: 2019

Comparison of the treatment guidelines for sarcoidosis: common sense in the search for evidence
Source: Eur Respir J, 59 (2) 2103114; 10.1183/13993003.03114-2021
Year: 2022



Physical activity level in patients with bronchiectasis: a systematic review of determinants and outcome measures
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Physical activity, exercise training and (tele)rehabilitation in respiratory patients
Year: 2021