Proposed new pulmonary hypertension definition: is 4 mm(Hg) worth re-writing medical textbooks?

J. Simon R. Gibbs, Adam Torbicki

Source: Eur Respir J, 53 (3) 1900197; 10.1183/13993003.00197-2019

Journal Issue: March

Rating:

You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
J. Simon R. Gibbs, Adam Torbicki. Proposed new pulmonary hypertension definition: is 4 mm(Hg) worth re-writing medical textbooks?. Eur Respir J, 53 (3) 1900197; 10.1183/13993003.00197-2019

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

You must Login to comment this presentation.

Related content which might interest you:

Paediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: updates on definition, classification, diagnostics and management Source: Eur Respir J, 53 (1) 1801916; 10.1183/13993003.01916-2018 Year: 2019
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: do scientists focus on publishing rather than on clinical relevance? Source: Eur Respir J, 55 (6) 2000811; 10.1183/13993003.00811-2020 Year: 2020
Pulmonary hypertension: basic concepts and practical management Source: Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 236-237 Year: 2008
Published literature and guidelines in thoracic oncology: what is worth reading? Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Good quality clinical recommendations for thoracic malignancy management in Europe Year: 2012
Image-based recommendations for the evaluation of pulmonary embolism and arterial hypertension: what? when? how? Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Image-based guidelines and recommendations in respiratory diseases Year: 2020
The new haemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension: evidence prevails, finally! Source: Eur Respir J, 53 (3) 1900038; 10.1183/13993003.00038-2019 Year: 2019
Definition of COPD: based on evidence or opinion? Source: Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 681-682 Year: 2008
The best papers in the ERJ: paediatric pulmonary diseases Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – The European Respiratory Journal editor's view: our best papers of last year Year: 2020
Pro: The current classification of pulmonary hypertension meets clinical practice Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – The current classification of pulmonary hypertension meets clinical practice Year: 2021
Pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension: what the interested clinician needs to know Source: ERS Course 2020 - Pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary vascular disease Year: 2020
Exercise training for pulmonary hypertension: another prescription to write? Source: Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 7-8 Year: 2012
E-learning course on COPD prevention for Russian GP: what do the doctors say? Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Smoking and the lung Year: 2007
Debating the new haemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension: much ado about nothing? Source: Eur Respir J, 54 (2) 1901278; 10.1183/13993003.01278-2019 Year: 2019
Con: The current classification of pulmonary hypertension meets clinical practice Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – The current classification of pulmonary hypertension meets clinical practice Year: 2021
Paediatric pulmonary hypertension: monitoring progress and identifying unmet needs Source: Eur Respir Rev 2009; 18: 18-23 Year: 2009
Translating research into practice: how are guidelines implemented? Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 21: 23S-29S Year: 2003
Epigenetics and pulmonary diseases in the horizon of precision medicine: a review Source: Eur Respir J, 57 (6) 2003406; 10.1183/13993003.03406-2020 Year: 2021
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: do we need a new definition? Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1401-1403 Year: 2014