Assessment of repeatability of eNose (SpiroNose) measurements in healthy and asthmatic subjects
R. de Vries (Amsterdam, Netherlands), J. Dagelet (Amsterdam, Netherlands), U. Frey (Basel, Switzerland), R. Lutter (Amsterdam, Netherlands), A. Maitland-Van Der Zee (Amsterdam, Netherlands), P. Sterk (Amsterdam, Netherlands), A. Sinha (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Source: International Congress 2018 – Evolving approaches to differential diagnosis
Session: Evolving approaches to differential diagnosis
Session type: Oral Presentation
Number: 315
Disease area: Airway diseases
Rating:
You must login to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
R. de Vries (Amsterdam, Netherlands), J. Dagelet (Amsterdam, Netherlands), U. Frey (Basel, Switzerland), R. Lutter (Amsterdam, Netherlands), A. Maitland-Van Der Zee (Amsterdam, Netherlands), P. Sterk (Amsterdam, Netherlands), A. Sinha (Amsterdam, Netherlands). Assessment of repeatability of eNose (SpiroNose) measurements in healthy and asthmatic subjects. 315
You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
Related content which might interest you:
Related content which might interest you:
Intra-subject variability of bio-impedance measurements in healthy subjects and COPD-patients Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 401s Year: 2004
Repeatability and reproducibility of the lung clearance index (LCI) in healthy adolescents Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Crossroads between paediatric respiratory physiology and epidemiology Year: 2007
Reproducibility, reliability and diurnal variation of standardized exhaled NO measurements with NIOX™ in healthy and asthmatic children and adults made in routine clinical practice Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 4s Year: 2001
Respiratory impedance in healthy subjects: baseline values and bronchodilator response Source: Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 1513-1523 Year: 2013
Repeatability study comparing plethysmographic and spirometric lung function parameters in COPD patients, asthmatics, and healthy subjects Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 221s Year: 2006
X5 values measured on Impulse Oscillometry (IOS) help differentiate healthy, asthmatic, COPD and ILD subjects from one another. Source: International Congress 2018 – Respiratory physiology and measurements Year: 2018
Repeatability and reproducibility of impulse oscillometry and body plethysmography in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Airway calibre, airway challenge and assessment of oxygenation Year: 2013
Multiple breath washout (MBW): within-test repeatability and short-term reproducibility of FRC and lung clearance index (LCI) in healthy children and adolescents Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Diagnostic paediatric lung function: technical and clinical aspects Year: 2008
Repeatability of standardised nasal NO measurements with NIOX® in healthy and asthmatic children and adults made in routine clinical practice Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 442s Year: 2003
Test-retest reliability of optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) in healthy subjects Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Respiratory muscles and breathing: assessment and training Year: 2010
Reference values of MostGraph (forced oscillation technique) for healthy Japanese adults Source: International Congress 2017 – Lung function practice in daily life Year: 2017
Within- and between-visit repeatability of impulse oscillometry in healthy and symptomatic young children Source: International Congress 2016 – Techniques and tools in paediatric asthma Year: 2016
Repeatibility of eNO measurements in asthmatic and healthy children Source: Annual Congress 2003 - Role of exhaled NO in diagnosis and therapy of childhood asthma Year: 2003
Repeatability of isokinetic testing in COPD and healthy subjects Source: Annual Congress 2009 - New treatment and outcome measures for pulmonary rehabilitation Year: 2009
FeNO is not affected by spirometry, IOS or walking in healthy subjects or well controlled asthma patients Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical characteristics and diagnostic tools for phenotyping asthma and COPD Year: 2020
Measurement duration impacts variability but not impedance measured by the forced oscillation technique in healthy, asthma and COPD subjects Source: ERJ Open Res 2016: 00094-2015 Year: 2016
Comparison of breathing acoustic characteristics in patients with asthma and healthy volunteers Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 118s Year: 2005
Impulse oscillometry parameters variability and response to bronchodilator in healthy adults Source: International Congress 2017 – Lung function testing Year: 2017
Impulse Ocscillometry is a reproducible assessment of airway resistance and reactance in well-controlled asthmatics and healthy controls. Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical characteristics and diagnostic tools for phenotyping asthma and COPD Year: 2020
Comparison of sensitivity and variability of sGaw and FEV1 for measuring bronchodilation in healthy and asthmatic subjects Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 338s Year: 2004