Assessment of repeatability of eNose (SpiroNose) measurements in healthy and asthmatic subjects

R. de Vries (Amsterdam, Netherlands), J. Dagelet (Amsterdam, Netherlands), U. Frey (Basel, Switzerland), R. Lutter (Amsterdam, Netherlands), A. Maitland-Van Der Zee (Amsterdam, Netherlands), P. Sterk (Amsterdam, Netherlands), A. Sinha (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Source: International Congress 2018 – Evolving approaches to differential diagnosis
Session: Evolving approaches to differential diagnosis
Session type: Oral Presentation
Number: 315
Disease area: Airway diseases

Congress or journal article abstractWebcastSlide presentation

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
R. de Vries (Amsterdam, Netherlands), J. Dagelet (Amsterdam, Netherlands), U. Frey (Basel, Switzerland), R. Lutter (Amsterdam, Netherlands), A. Maitland-Van Der Zee (Amsterdam, Netherlands), P. Sterk (Amsterdam, Netherlands), A. Sinha (Amsterdam, Netherlands). Assessment of repeatability of eNose (SpiroNose) measurements in healthy and asthmatic subjects. 315

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Intra-subject variability of bio-impedance measurements in healthy subjects and COPD-patients
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 401s
Year: 2004

Repeatability and reproducibility of the lung clearance index (LCI) in healthy adolescents
Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Crossroads between paediatric respiratory physiology and epidemiology
Year: 2007


Reproducibility, reliability and diurnal variation of standardized exhaled NO measurements with NIOX™ in healthy and asthmatic children and adults made in routine clinical practice
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 4s
Year: 2001

Respiratory impedance in healthy subjects: baseline values and bronchodilator response
Source: Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 1513-1523
Year: 2013



Repeatability study comparing plethysmographic and spirometric lung function parameters in COPD patients, asthmatics, and healthy subjects
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 221s
Year: 2006

X5 values measured on Impulse Oscillometry (IOS) help differentiate healthy, asthmatic, COPD and ILD subjects from one another.
Source: International Congress 2018 – Respiratory physiology and measurements
Year: 2018


Repeatability and reproducibility of impulse oscillometry and body plethysmography in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Airway calibre, airway challenge and assessment of oxygenation
Year: 2013

Multiple breath washout (MBW): within-test repeatability and short-term reproducibility of FRC and lung clearance index (LCI) in healthy children and adolescents
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Diagnostic paediatric lung function: technical and clinical aspects
Year: 2008

Repeatability of standardised nasal NO measurements with NIOX® in healthy and asthmatic children and adults made in routine clinical practice
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 442s
Year: 2003

Test-retest reliability of optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) in healthy subjects
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Respiratory muscles and breathing: assessment and training
Year: 2010

Reference values of MostGraph (forced oscillation technique) for healthy Japanese adults
Source: International Congress 2017 – Lung function practice in daily life
Year: 2017

Within- and between-visit repeatability of impulse oscillometry in healthy and symptomatic young children
Source: International Congress 2016 – Techniques and tools in paediatric asthma
Year: 2016

Repeatibility of eNO measurements in asthmatic and healthy children
Source: Annual Congress 2003 - Role of exhaled NO in diagnosis and therapy of childhood asthma
Year: 2003


Repeatability of isokinetic testing in COPD and healthy subjects
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - New treatment and outcome measures for pulmonary rehabilitation
Year: 2009


FeNO is not affected by spirometry, IOS or walking in healthy subjects or well controlled asthma patients
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical characteristics and diagnostic tools for phenotyping asthma and COPD
Year: 2020

Measurement duration impacts variability but not impedance measured by the forced oscillation technique in healthy, asthma and COPD subjects
Source: ERJ Open Res 2016: 00094-2015
Year: 2016



Comparison of breathing acoustic characteristics in patients with asthma and healthy volunteers
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 118s
Year: 2005

Impulse oscillometry parameters variability and response to bronchodilator in healthy adults
Source: International Congress 2017 – Lung function testing
Year: 2017

Impulse Ocscillometry is a reproducible assessment of airway resistance and reactance in well-controlled asthmatics and healthy controls.
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Clinical characteristics and diagnostic tools for phenotyping asthma and COPD
Year: 2020

Comparison of sensitivity and variability of sGaw and FEV1 for measuring bronchodilation in healthy and asthmatic subjects
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 338s
Year: 2004