The role of reference values in interpreting lung function tests

Crapo R.O.

Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: 341-342
Journal Issue: September

PDF journal article, handout or slidesFull text journal article

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
Crapo R.O.. The role of reference values in interpreting lung function tests. Eur Respir J 2004; 24: 341-342

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Paediatric lung function tests reference values: appropriateness and interpretation
Source: International Congress 2015 – ME10 Paediatric lung function tests reference values
Year: 2015




Reference values for lung function: past, present and future
Source: Eur Respir J 2010; 36: 12-19
Year: 2010



Pre-operative evaluation of lung function test results
Source: Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 935
Year: 2010


Comparison of regression models for developing spirometric reference values
Source: International Congress 2016 – Functional assessment of the airways
Year: 2016


The TLNO/TLCO ratio in pulmonary function test interpretation
Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 311
Year: 2004


The TLNO/TLCO ratio in pulmonary function test interpretation
Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 310
Year: 2004


The clinical value of trend reports in pulmonary function testing
Source: International Congress 2015 – CC5 Interpretation of pulmonary function testing
Year: 2015



Interpreting pulmonary function tests
Source: Breathe 2009; 6: 102-110
Year: 2009

Comparison of predicted lung function values estimating height from alternative methods
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Beyond spirometry: the skills behind lung function testing
Year: 2008

The use of FENO in COPD: the relationship to pulmonary function tests and its importance in differential diagnosis.
Source: International Congress 2017 – Classifying COPD with multidimensional scores and biomarkers
Year: 2017

An in vivo comparison of two lung function systems
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 177s
Year: 2005

Evaluation of the relationship between laboratory parameters and pulmonary function tests in COVID-19 patients
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – COVID - 19 risk predictions
Year: 2021

Aligning lung function equipment and reference values in adults.
Source: International Congress 2019 – Physiologic assessment of airway diseases
Year: 2019

Comparison of usefulness of selected lung function tests in the diagnosis of exercise induced bronchoconstriction
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Clinical aspects of asthma and allergic respiratory diseases
Year: 2010

Systematic differences in lung function outcomes in a new lung function lab.
Source: International Congress 2017 – Discussion of techniques and technologies in lung function
Year: 2017

The impact of different reference standards when estimating the accuracy of tests for diagnosing asthma
Source: International Congress 2018 – Primary care management of asthma
Year: 2018

Better time management of a lung function laboratory by avoiding redundant ”routinely“ performed reversibility spirometry tests
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 147s
Year: 2003

The role of lung function testing and eNO in monitoring asthma
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Primary Care Programme "Asthma management in clinical practice"
Year: 2013