Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Venous thromboembolic disease



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
P. Duru Cetinkaya, G. Ari, M. Ozkan, O. Fevzi Erer, S. Aktogu Ozkan (Izmir, Turkey). The comparison of three different clinical probability methods and the ECG score in patients with suspected venous thromboembolism. Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 3547

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: Comparison of three clinical probability methods among patients with suspected pulmonary thromboembolism Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease Year: 2008 Evaluation of different scoring methods in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease and other pulmonary vascular disorders Year: 2010 Comparison of the clinical probability scores and diagnostic tests of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease Year: 2008 Comparison of three clinical scoring methods in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism Source: Annual Congress 2006 - Pulmonary embolism Year: 2006 Comparison of three clinical prediction rules among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 685s Year: 2004 Diagnostic values of scoring systems in the clinical approach to pulmonary thromboembolism Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Prediction of pulmonary thromboembolism Year: 2011 D-dimer testing and pre-test probability scoring in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Prediction of pulmonary thromboembolism Year: 2011 Feasibility of pretest probability scoring to predict pulmonary embolism (PE) in routine clinical practice Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 219s Year: 2003 Clinical usefulness of D-dimer according to clinical probability in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 220s Year: 2003 The use of pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) score in identifying patients suitable for ambulatory treatment or early hospital discharge following diagnosis of pulmonary embolism Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Clinical management of lung diseases: from bronchi to pleura Year: 2012 Prognostic value of two clinical scores in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Clinical features of pulmonary thromboembolism Year: 2011 Clinical experience does not affect pre-test clinical probability scores used to exclude pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 238s Year: 2002 The value of clinical probability tools in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients having CT pulmonary angiography Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Pulmonary embolism Year: 2009 Derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for thrombolysis-associated major bleeding in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: the BACS score Source: Eur Respir J, 56 (6) 2002336; 10.1183/13993003.02336-2020 Year: 2020 Comparision of the severity of the disease and 4 different clinical scoring systems in pulmonary embolism Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Pulmonary embolism and cardiovascular diseases Year: 2009 Validation of a non-invasive diagnostic algorithm in assessment of patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 238s Year: 2002 A structured clinical model for predicting the probability of pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 559s Year: 2004 Hestia criteria can discriminate high- from low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism Source: Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 588-592 Year: 2013 Adequate use of pulmonary embolism clinical prediction rule in COPD patients Source: Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 219-220 Year: 2011 Role of a clinical prediction score in a chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension rule-out strategy Source: Eur Respir J, 51 (4) 1702576; 10.1183/13993003.02576-2017 Year: 2018