What regulatory framework is preferable for successful harm reduction?

F. Godfrey (Luxemburg, Luxemburg)

Source: Research Seminar 2005 - Tobacco Smoking: Harm Reduction Strategies
Number: 11
Disease area: Airway diseases

Slide presentation

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
F. Godfrey (Luxemburg, Luxemburg). What regulatory framework is preferable for successful harm reduction?. Research Seminar 2005 - Tobacco Smoking: Harm Reduction Strategies

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
A rational approach to e-cigarettes: challenging ERS policy on tobacco harm reduction
Source: Eur Respir J, 55 (5) 2000166; 10.1183/13993003.00166-2020
Year: 2020



A rational approach to e-cigarettes: challenging ERS policy on tobacco harm reduction
Source: Eur Respir J, 55 (5) 2000355; 10.1183/13993003.00355-2020
Year: 2020



What makes a situation challenging? How to implement a communication approach
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – How to deal with difficult people
Year: 2020

Halotherapy and Covid-19: an oppinion for a possible future prevention approach
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – COVID – 19: treatments and predictive factors
Year: 2021


Do we need a gender-specific approach for health interventions?
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Highlights on gender and respiratory health
Year: 2021


What makes a team effective?
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Teamability: becoming an effective team leader and member
Year: 2020

Ensuring rational introduction and responsible use of new TB tools: outcome of an ERS multisector consultation
Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1412-1417
Year: 2014


What do we need in the clinic and what approach can clinicians take to improve the drug development pipeline?
Source: ERS Research Seminar 2016
Year: 2016

Was the implementation strategy of the ProACT trial adequately proactive?
Source: Breathe, 15 (1) 77; 10.1183/20734735.0338-2018
Year: 2019



Getting approval for new therapeutic medical devices versus drugs: are the differences justified?
Source: Eur Respir Rev 2016; 25: 223-226
Year: 2016


What next? Basic research, new treatments and a patient-centred approach in controlling tuberculosis
Source: Eur Respir Monogr 2018; 82: 414-429
Year: 2018


Rethinking the way we are treating established airway disease: current guidelines need to change 
Source: International Congress 2016 – Presentation and discussion of a draft Lancet Commission on Asthma
Year: 2016


Aiming for total control in asthma: an ineffective use of resources?
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 429s
Year: 2005

The need and potential of patient-specific modelling
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - PG13 AirPROM: patient-specific modelling and systems biology living labs workshop
Year: 2012



Scaling-up global implementation of LTBI management: a paradigm shift needed
Source: International Congress 2016 – ERS and tuberculosis
Year: 2016