Protocols for the follow-up of pulmonary nodules: are they necessary?

J. Greenwood, J. Earis, C. Warburton, R. Angus (Liverpool, United Kingdom)

Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Lung neoplasms
Session: Lung neoplasms
Session type: Thematic Poster Session
Number: 3363
Disease area: Thoracic oncology

Congress or journal article abstractE-poster

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
J. Greenwood, J. Earis, C. Warburton, R. Angus (Liverpool, United Kingdom). Protocols for the follow-up of pulmonary nodules: are they necessary?. Eur Respir J 2007; 30: Suppl. 51, 3363

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Home spirometry for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: ready for prime time?
Source: Eur Respir J, 50 (1) 1701403; 10.1183/13993003.01403-2017
Year: 2017



Proper follow-up of solitary pulmonary nodules
Source: ERS Online Course 2019: Essentials of modern lung cancer care – catch up with the latest advances
Year: 2019


Pulmonary nodules – incidental findings can we wait?
Source: International Congress 2018 – Lung cancer screening and management of solitary pulmonary nodules
Year: 2018


Pulmonary rehabilitation for bronchiectasis: if not now, when?
Source: Eur Respir J, 53 (1) 1802474; 10.1183/13993003.02474-2018
Year: 2019



Advanced pulmonary sarcoidosis: long-term follow-up of 10 years or more.
Source: International Congress 2018 – Sarcoidosis: from basic research to patient outcomes
Year: 2018




Incidental or screen based findings of pulmonary nodules: what to do?
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Image-based guidelines and recommendations in respiratory diseases
Year: 2020


Interventional treatment of pulmonary hypertension: where are we now?
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Breathing disorders and cardiovascular diseases
Year: 2020


Image-based recommendations for the evaluation of pulmonary embolism and arterial hypertension: what? when? how?
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Image-based guidelines and recommendations in respiratory diseases
Year: 2020


Recommendation of proper follow-up for peripheral pulmonary lesions with non-malignant result by bronchoscopy
Source: International Congress 2018 – Lung cancer: from early diagnosis to modern monitoring strategies
Year: 2018




Massive and sub-massive pulmonary embolism (PE) long-term follow up data: Is there a need for dedicated PE clinics?
Source: International Congress 2018 – Diagnosis, prognostication and treatment of pulmonary embolism
Year: 2018


Pulmonary embolism and pulmonary hypertension - is our follow up adequate?
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 270s
Year: 2005

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: securing a confident diagnosis for every patient
Source: Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 1057-1059
Year: 2016


Solitary pulmonary nodules: approach options
Source: International Congress 2016 – PG14 Interventional pulmonology
Year: 2016



Making the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: what do the guidelines say?
Source: ERS Course 2020 - Pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary vascular disease
Year: 2020

Lost in translation: Does radiological evidence of right ventricular strain in acute pulmonary embolism trigger echocardiographic follow-up?
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Pulmonary circulation: acute pulmonary tromboembolism
Year: 2013


Surgical lung biopsy for interstitial lung disease: when considered necessary, should these be done in larger and experienced centres only?
Source: Eur Respir J, 53 (2) 1900023; 10.1183/13993003.00023-2019
Year: 2019



COVID-19: Is pulmonary damage present after 10 weeks follow-up?
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Chronic COVID - 19
Year: 2021



Evolution of pulmonary embolism: 1 year of follow-up
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 401s
Year: 2006