e-learning
resources
Virtual 2021
06.09.2021
Future advances in respiratory physiology
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
The acceptability criterion for the difference between the forced inspiratory vital capacity (FIVC) and the forced vital capacity (FVC) are too strict?
M. Chushkin (Moscow, Russian Federation), L. Popova (Moscow, Russian Federation), E. Shergina (Moscow, Russian Federation), A. Egorova (Moscow, Russian Federation), N. Karpina (Moscow, Russian Federation)
Source:
Virtual Congress 2021 – Future advances in respiratory physiology
Session:
Future advances in respiratory physiology
Session type:
E-poster
Number:
2510
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
M. Chushkin (Moscow, Russian Federation), L. Popova (Moscow, Russian Federation), E. Shergina (Moscow, Russian Federation), A. Egorova (Moscow, Russian Federation), N. Karpina (Moscow, Russian Federation). The acceptability criterion for the difference between the forced inspiratory vital capacity (FIVC) and the forced vital capacity (FVC) are too strict?. 2510
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
From pulmonary gas exchange to the interpretation of arterial blood gases
The physiology of breathlessness
Respiratory physiology
Related content which might interest you:
The inclusion of peak expiratory flow (PEF) among selection criteria of the ”best test“ may increase diagnostic ability of forced vital capacity (FVC)
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 202s
Year: 2001
Is the forced expiratory volume in 6 seconds (FEV
6
) a more reproducible and accurate measurement than forced vital capacity (FVC) in obstructive and normal/restrictive patients
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 13s
Year: 2001
Use of forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second quality criteria for determining a valid test
Source: Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 1283-1292
Year: 2015
Forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in six seconds as predictors of reduced total lung capacity
Source: Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 391-395
Year: 2008
Predicted values for the forced expiratory flow adjusted for forced vital capacity, a descriptive study
Source: ERJ Open Res, 6 (4) 00426-2020; 10.1183/23120541.00426-2020
Year: 2020
Is forced expiratory volume in six seconds a valid alternative to forced vital capacity?
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: 1288-1289
Year: 2006
Sources of variation in forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 767-773
Year: 2006
Slow vital capacity : differences between expiratory and inspiratory vital capacities
Source: International Congress 2019 – Insights into physiological diagnostic services
Year: 2019
Comparison of forced, slow, and 6 second vital capacity manoeuvres
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry!
Year: 2008
The technical definition of forced vital capacity
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Quality spirometry: the only spirometry!
Year: 2008
Should forced expiratory volume in six seconds replace forced vital capacity to detect airway obstruction?
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 1244-1250
Year: 2006
Does negative expiratory pressure (NEP) influence the performances of forced expiratory manoeuvres in elderly patient?
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 32s
Year: 2002
FEF
25-75%
should not yet be used to define a bronchodilator response in individuals
Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Spirometry - now and in the future
Year: 2005
Lung function measurement in respiratory diseases: mechanisms
Source: Annual Congress 2006 - PG5 - Respiratory physiology: interpreting lung function in health and disease
Year: 2006
Forced spirometry reference values for Norwegian adults: the Bronchial Obstruction in Nord-Trondelag study
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: 770-779
Year: 2001
Is inspiratory capacity (IC) better correlated with functional exercise capacity than FEV1 in COPD patients?
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Lung function tests in monitoring airway diseases
Year: 2012
Obstructive ventilatory defect with normal forced expiratory volume in one second/vital capacity ratio
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 1069-1070
Year: 2006
Monocyte count and decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) in patients with IPF
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Biomarkers and mechanistic aspects of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Year: 2020
Spirometric reference equations for European females and males aged 65-85 yrs
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: 397-405
Year: 2004
Does DNA methylation mediate the association of age at puberty with forced vital capacity or forced expiratory volume in 1 s?
Source: ERJ Open Res, 8 (1) 00476-2021; 10.1183/23120541.00476-2021
Year: 2022
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept