Con: The current classification of pulmonary hypertension meets clinical practice

H. Bogaard (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – The current classification of pulmonary hypertension meets clinical practice
Session: The current classification of pulmonary hypertension meets clinical practice
Session type: Pro-Con debate
Number: 1673

WebcastSlide presentation

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
H. Bogaard (Amsterdam, Netherlands). Con: The current classification of pulmonary hypertension meets clinical practice. Virtual Congress 2021 – The current classification of pulmonary hypertension meets clinical practice

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
Pro: The current classification of pulmonary hypertension meets clinical practice
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – The current classification of pulmonary hypertension meets clinical practice
Year: 2021


Diagnostic evaluation of paediatric pulmonary hypertension in current clinical practice
Source: Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 689-700
Year: 2013



Paediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: updates on definition, classification, diagnostics and management
Source: Eur Respir J, 53 (1) 1801916; 10.1183/13993003.01916-2018
Year: 2019



Metabolic dysfunction in pulmonary hypertension: from basic science to clinical practice
Source: Eur Respir Rev, 26 (146) 170094; 10.1183/16000617.0094-2017
Year: 2017



Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment service: guidelines for referral and accuracy of clinical assessment
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 299s
Year: 2005

Translating research into practice: how are guidelines implemented?
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 21: 23S-29S
Year: 2003



The definition of pulmonary hypertension: history, practical implications and current controversies
Source: Breathe, 17 (3) 210076; 10.1183/20734735.0076-2021
Year: 2021



Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension
Source: Eur Respir J, 53 (1) 1801913; 10.1183/13993003.01913-2018
Year: 2019



Treatment of COPD by clinical phenotypes: putting old evidence into clinical practice
Source: Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 1252-1256
Year: 2013



An international survey of current pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) management
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Pulmonary circulation: clinical PAH, registries and treatments
Year: 2012


Pulmonary hypertension and lung diseases: a suggestion for revision of the clinical classification
Source: Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 700-701
Year: 2010


COPD: algorithms and clinical management
Source: Eur Respir J, 50 (5) 1701733; 10.1183/13993003.01733-2017
Year: 2017



Guidelines versus clinical practice in the treatment of COPD: a reappraisal
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 656
Year: 2006


Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: from guidelines to clinical practice
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Clinical aspects of diffuse parenchymal lung disease
Year: 2009

Impact of guidelines for the management of pulmonary embolism in clinical practice
Source: International Congress 2019 – Breathing disorders, cardiovascular disease and pulmonary embolism guidelines
Year: 2019


The new definition of pulmonary hypertension
Source: Eur Respir J 2009; 34: 790-791
Year: 2009


An audit of COPD: diagnosis and management in general practice
Source: ERJ Open Res, 6 (4) 00330-2020; 10.1183/23120541.00330-2020
Year: 2020



Genetic testing in pulmonary hypertension: how should our clinical practice reflect recent advances?
Source: Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 388-389
Year: 2016


Pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with group 3 pulmonary hypertension: evaluation of clinical outcomes, adherence and safety.
Source: International Congress 2019 – The future of pulmonary rehabilitation discussed today
Year: 2019