e-learning
resources
Madrid 2019
Sunday, 29.09.2019
Quality, performance and interpretation of lung function testing
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
Within session variability of FEV1 and FVC pre- and post-bronchodilation
B. Coupland (Birmingham, United Kingdom), J. Stockley (Birmingham, United Kingdom), B. Cooper (Birmingham, United Kingdom)
Source:
International Congress 2019 – Quality, performance and interpretation of lung function testing
Session:
Quality, performance and interpretation of lung function testing
Session type:
Thematic Poster
Number:
1134
Disease area:
Airway diseases
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
B. Coupland (Birmingham, United Kingdom), J. Stockley (Birmingham, United Kingdom), B. Cooper (Birmingham, United Kingdom). Within session variability of FEV1 and FVC pre- and post-bronchodilation. 1134
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Panel discussion: What’s NEW in the 2022 ERS/ATS PFT Interpretation Statement
Verification of flow rate stability in high-flow nasal cannula devices
DLCO biological controls in clinical practice.
Related content which might interest you:
Midflows do not vary independently of FEV1 and FVC
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Quality measurement and improvement in lung function
Year: 2010
The influence of FVC manoeuvres on consecutive FEV
1
values during methacholine challenge
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 587s
Year: 2004
FEV6 and FEV1/FEV6 as an alternative for FVC and FEV1/FVC in monitoring response to prednisolone treatment
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Quality measurement and improvement in lung function
Year: 2010
Comparison of prebronchodilator FEV1/FEV6 of handheld spirometry with postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC of spirometry in Korea: a pilot study
Source: International Congress 2017 – Chronic airway disease: markers of disease impact
Year: 2017
Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometric values and the degree of reversibility in patients with COPD
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: 332
Year: 2004
Using the pre-bronchodilator spirometry curvature to improve estimation of post-bronchodilator airflow obstruction
Source: International Congress 2019 – Physiologic assessment of airway diseases
Year: 2019
Auscultatory forced expiratory time as a predictor of FEV1 and as a clinical test of airway obstruction
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 225s
Year: 2004
FEF
25-75%
should not yet be used to define a bronchodilator response in individuals
Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Spirometry - now and in the future
Year: 2005
Annual decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) in patients with COPD before and after introduction of tiotropium
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Pathogenesis and treatment of asthma and COPD
Year: 2008
FEV6 and FEV1/FEV6 have higher association with small airway function and oxygen saturation than FVC and FEV1/FVC in patients with asthma.
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Lung function tests and exhaled biomarkers
Year: 2020
FEV6 as a surrogate for FVC in detecting airways obstruction and restriction in the workplace
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 374-377
Year: 2006
Distinguishing hyperinflation from combined restriction in patients with reduced FEV
1
/FVC and FVC on spirometry
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 202s
Year: 2006
Is the forced expiratory volume in 6 seconds (FEV
6
) a more reproducible and accurate measurement than forced vital capacity (FVC) in obstructive and normal/restrictive patients
Source: Eur Respir J 2001; 18: Suppl. 33, 13s
Year: 2001
Can the prediction point for FEV1 / FVC be determined in patients with insufficient expiratory maneuver to determine airflow obstruction?
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Advances in lung function testing
Year: 2020
Reference values for FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC in Norway
Source: International Congress 2015 – Epidemiology of respiratory disease
Year: 2015
Ratio between forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of VC and FVC as a determinant of airway reactivity and sensitivity to methacholine
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 219s
Year: 2006
VEF1 and PEF correlation by digital peak expiratory flow and conventional spirometry in children
Source: International Congress 2018 – Respiratory physiology and measurements
Year: 2018
Comparison between peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and FEV1 in the monitoring of children suspected to asthma
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 506s
Year: 2002
FVC decline over 1 year predicts mortality but not subsequent FVC decline in patients with IPF
Source: International Congress 2017 – Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: from the bench to the bedside
Year: 2017
FVC manoeuvres generated by forced deflation in intubated children – how do they compare to voluntary FVC manoeuvres?
Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 674s
Year: 2005
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept