e-learning
resources
Paris 2018
Sunday, 16.09.2018
Advances in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment, tracheobronchial reconstruction using bioengineering and clinical prediction rules for diagnosing pulmonary embolism
Login
Search all ERS
e-learning
resources
Disease Areas
Airways Diseases
Interstitial Lung Diseases
Respiratory Critical Care
Respiratory Infections
Paediatric Respiratory Diseases
Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
Sleep and Breathing Disorders
Thoracic Oncology
Events
International Congress
Courses
Webinars
Conferences
Research Seminars
Journal Clubs
Publications
Breathe
Monograph
ERJ
ERJ Open Research
ERR
European Lung White Book
Handbook Series
Guidelines
All ERS guidelines
e-learning
CME Online
Case reports
Short Videos
SpirXpert
Procedure Videos
CME tests
Reference Database of Respiratory Sounds
Radiology Image Challenge
Brief tobacco interventions
EU Projects
VALUE-Dx
ERN-LUNG
ECRAID
UNITE4TB
Disease Areas
Events
Publications
Guidelines
e-learning
EU Projects
Login
Search
Advances in the clinical prediction rules that are used to assess patients with possible pulmonary embolism
Y. Freund (Paris, France)
Source:
International Congress 2018 – Advances in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment, tracheobronchial reconstruction using bioengineering and clinical prediction rules for diagnosing pulmonary embolism
Session:
Advances in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment, tracheobronchial reconstruction using bioengineering and clinical prediction rules for diagnosing pulmonary embolism
Session type:
Lunchtime session
Number:
1524
Disease area:
Interstitial lung diseases
Rating:
You must
login
to grade this presentation.
Share or cite this content
Citations should be made in the following way:
Y. Freund (Paris, France). Advances in the clinical prediction rules that are used to assess patients with possible pulmonary embolism. International Congress 2018 – Advances in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment, tracheobronchial reconstruction using bioengineering and clinical prediction rules for diagnosing pulmonary embolism
You must
login
to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.
Member's Comments
No comment yet.
You must
Login
to comment this presentation.
Related content which might interest you:
Comparison of acute phase reactant pentraksin-3 and inflammatory parameters in acute and stable pulmonary embolism
Features of patients newly diagnosed pulmonary embolism during COVID pneumonia
Diagnosis and treatment of chronic pulmonary embolism
Related content which might interest you:
Comparison of three clinical prediction rules among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 685s
Year: 2004
Adequate use of pulmonary embolism clinical prediction rule in COPD patients
Source: Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 219-220
Year: 2011
Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment for suspected pulmonary embolism
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 238s
Year: 2002
Validation of a non-invasive diagnostic algorithm in assessment of patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism
Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 238s
Year: 2002
Clinical manifestations and prediction rules in patients with pulmonary embolism and prior respiratory disease
Source: Annual Congress 2011 - Prediction of pulmonary thromboembolism
Year: 2011
Comparison of three clinical scoring methods in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism
Source: Annual Congress 2006 - Pulmonary embolism
Year: 2006
Comparison of three clinical probability methods among patients with suspected pulmonary thromboembolism
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease
Year: 2008
The evaluation of noninvasive diagnosis methods in pulmonary embolism diagnosis together with two different clinical possibility methods
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 45s
Year: 2006
A structured clinical model for predicting the probability of pulmonary embolism
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 559s
Year: 2004
Wells clinical prediction rule and pulmonary embolism rule out criteria (PERC) in preventing over investigation of pulmonary embolism in emergency departments
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Pulmonary circulation: acute and chronic pulmonary embolism
Year: 2012
Clinical probability and d-dimer utility in the context of suspected pulmonary embolism: The safe approach
Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease
Year: 2010
Comparison of risk assessment strategies for not-high-risk pulmonary embolism
Source: Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 1170-1178
Year: 2016
Clinical usefulness of D-dimer according to clinical probability in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 220s
Year: 2003
Improved identification of thrombolysis candidates amongst intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism patients: implications for future trials
Source: Eur Respir J, 51 (1) 1701775; 10.1183/13993003.01775-2017
Year: 2018
Clinical features and short-term outcomes of cancer patients with suspected and unsuspected pulmonary embolism: the EPIPHANY study
Source: Eur Respir J 2017; 49(1): 1600282; DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00282-2016
Year: 2017
Pulmonary embolism severity index is useful in predicting mortality in patients investigated for query pulmonary embolism and negative CTPA
Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Pulmonary venous thromboembolic disease
Year: 2008
Feasibility of pretest probability scoring to predict pulmonary embolism (PE) in routine clinical practice
Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 219s
Year: 2003
Clinical utility of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) in investigation of possible pulmonary embolism
Source: Annual Congress 2012 - Pulmonary circulation: acute and chronic pulmonary embolism
Year: 2012
A new clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the respiratory emergency department
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Acute and chronic venous thromboembolic disease
Year: 2009
Derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for thrombolysis-associated major bleeding in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: the BACS score
Source: Eur Respir J, 56 (6) 2002336; 10.1183/13993003.02336-2020
Year: 2020
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of the cookies.
Accept