Source: Eur Respir Rev 2016; 25: 259-265
Disease area: Airway diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
Tarricone Rosanna, Boscolo Paola Roberta, Armeni Patrizio. What type of clinical evidence is needed to assess medical devices?. Eur Respir Rev 2016; 25: 259-265

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: What requirements should a biomarker meet to be used in the clinical and epidemiological setting? Source: Annual Congress 2008 - Biomarkers in COPD - application in clinical and epidemiological studies Year: 2008 What kind of emphasis do we need in clinical research to enable personalised respiratory medicine? Source: Eur Respir J, 55 (1) 1901866; 10.1183/13993003.01866-2019 Year: 2020 Do the current endpoints in IPF clinical trials allow good regulatory decisions to be made? Source: International Congress 2014 – Ceremony for the ERS Rare Pulmonary Disease Research Award 2014 followed by the symposium "Challenges in endpoints for rare lung diseases" Year: 2014 A new model for clinical trials to address the COVID-19 emergency Source: Breathe, 16 (2) 200220; 10.1183/20734735.0220-2020 Year: 2020 Electronic monitoring devices in clinical trials – a doddle to use? Source: International Congress 2017 – Inhalers and their use Year: 2017 Getting approval for new therapeutic medical devices versus drugs: are the differences justified? Source: Eur Respir Rev 2016; 25: 223-226 Year: 2016 A survey of the multidisciplinary team‘s knowledge of the management of patients with COPD, in order to help identify future training needs Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Medical education Year: 2009 Is there a need for ongoing support for the interpretation of spirometry results by general practitioners? Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 740s Year: 2006 A systematic review to assess the components of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in chronic respiratory disease (CRD) and their relevance to physiotherapy management Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Digital health interventions in respiratory medicine Year: 2021 “I don’t think there’s a simple way of doing it:” the use of an electronic alert to identify excessive prescribing of short-acting beta2-agonists for people with asthma – a qualitative study with asthma experts and primary care staff Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Diagnosis and management of airways disease in primary care Year: 2020 The NIVO score: can it help to improve noninvasive ventilation in daily clinical practice? Source: Eur Respir J, 58 (2) 2100336; 10.1183/13993003.00336-2021 Year: 2021 Preventing skin care issues associated with face masks used for domiciliary non-invasive ventilation: what do users and their carers think are the most relevant future research questions? Source: International Congress 2019 – Treatment of chronic respiratory failure with noninvasive ventilation Year: 2019 A 3-month period of electronic monitoring can provide important information to the healthcare team to assess adherence and improve asthma control Source: ERJ Open Res, 7 (3) 00726-2020; 10.1183/23120541.00726-2020 Year: 2021 Can education and electronic prescription improve the use oxygen in acute clinical settings? Source: Annual Congress 2011 - The eclectic world of respiratory nursing Year: 2011 A critical evaluation of the relevance of different asthma phenotypes for clinical practice Source: Annual Congress 2008 - A step-change in asthma. The Lancet/ERS symposium Year: 2008 Do we have enough evidence overall, or should we wait for ongoing trials? Source: International Congress 2014 – From respiratory infections to wheezing: reevaluating the role of vitamin D levels in childhood Year: 2014 Clinical trial landscape for M/XDR-TB: current evidence and future perspectives Source: International Congress 2019 – Recent developments and future perspectives in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis Year: 2019 Is the question ² how is your asthma doing? ² sufficient to assess asthma control in primary care? Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 269s Year: 2004