Getting approval for new therapeutic medical devices versus drugs: are the differences justified?

Frigerio Maria

Source: Eur Respir Rev 2016; 25: 223-226
Journal Issue: September

Full text journal articlePDF journal article, handout or slides

Rating: 0
You must login to grade this presentation.

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
Frigerio Maria. Getting approval for new therapeutic medical devices versus drugs: are the differences justified?. Eur Respir Rev 2016; 25: 223-226

You must login to share this Presentation/Article on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn or by email.

Member's Comments

No comment yet.
You must Login to comment this presentation.


Related content which might interest you:
The issues and the controversies: are we really ready for on-demand use of ICS?
Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: on-demand or continuous use?
Year: 2013


Making clinical sense of the explosion in biologics - which drug for which patient and why?
Source: International Congress 2019 – PG10 Severe asthma in adults: systematic assessment and biological treatment
Year: 2019


Application of management guidelines to the assessment of new medicines: driving us forward or holding us back?
Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 23: 793-794
Year: 2004


Prescriptions for treatment in patients with PCD: does clinical routine match recommendations?
Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Worldwide respiratory disease across the full spectrum
Year: 2020


Evidence-based medicines for children: important implications for new therapies at all ages
Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: 1069-1072
Year: 2006


Acceptance criteria for intensive care: we need new definitions and legislations for futile treatment!
Source: International Congress 2017 – COPD and weaning
Year: 2017


Tuberculosis elimination, patients' lives and rational use of new drugs: revisited
Source: Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 664-667
Year: 2016


Respiratory medicines for children: current evidence, unlicensed use and research priorities
Source: Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 247-265
Year: 2010



Protocol of early mobilization and rehabilitation in critical patients using inotropic medications: Is it really safe? Our hands on practice!
Source: International Congress 2019 – Exercise and rehabilitation in patients with acute and chronic respiratory diseases
Year: 2019

Foundation doctor knowledge of inhaled devices - Are the old better than the new?
Source: International Congress 2016 – Abstracts in medical education, the web and the internet
Year: 2016


Biologics: current use and future applications for personalised therapy
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Wheezing illnesses along the life span
Year: 2021


Clinical use of new and repurposed drugs: the role and contribution of the ERS collaborative projects
Source: International Congress 2017 – In the frontline of the fight against tuberculosis
Year: 2017


Who can pay for innovative medicines?
Source: Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 495-496
Year: 2013


Preventing skin care issues associated with face masks used for domiciliary non-invasive ventilation: what do users and their carers think are the most relevant future research questions?
Source: International Congress 2019 – Treatment of chronic respiratory failure with noninvasive ventilation
Year: 2019


Introducing a new formulation of pirfenidone to reduce tablet burden for the IPF patient: Is it tolerable? Is it easy to take? What do our patients think?
Source: International Congress 2018 – Management of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: established and new treatments
Year: 2018


The sustainability agenda and inhaled therapy: what do patients want?
Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Asthma inhalers: new devices and adherence
Year: 2021


Do we need new antibiotics?
Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Antibiotics and the lung
Year: 2009