Source: Annual Congress 2005 - Assessing respiratory function: QA and specific applications
Disease area: Airway diseases, Interstitial lung diseases



Rating:

Share or cite this content

Citations should be made in the following way:
M. H. Aussems, P. P. Diederen, P. J. Bongaerts, S. A. Veugen, C. P. van der Grinten (Maastricht, Netherlands). Replacing equipment for diffusing capacity: what change in values is acceptable?. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 1148

Member's Comments

No comment yet.

Related content which might interest you: CO diffusing capacity: are adjustments of CO diffusing capacity necessary? Source: Annual Congress 2006 - Implementation of the new standards on clinical pulmonary function testing Year: 2006 Should diffusing capacity quality control be treated like other laboratory devices? Source: Eur Respir J, 58 (6) 2102642; 10.1183/13993003.02642-2021 Year: 2021 New reference equations: What changes in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide interpretation? Source: Virtual Congress 2020 – Advances in lung function practice Year: 2020 Measuring improvement in dyspnoea: should absolute or relative values be used? Source: Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1700-1703 Year: 2014 FEV1/FEV3 ratio: a potential alternative to full spirometry for patients unable to sustain forced expiration? Source: Annual Congress 2007 - Lung function and therapy in obstructive lung diseases Year: 2007 Maximal aerobic capacity in ageing subjects: actual measurements versus predicted values Source: ERJ Open Res 2016 Year: 2016 Spirometric measurement of inspiratory capacity in normal subjects: are the available references values useful? Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 380s Year: 2002 ECCS/ERS reference values for spirometry – are they still applicable? Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 185s Year: 2004 Impact of the choice of CO and NO conductance values on the interpretation of CO and NO diffusion capacities Source: Annual Congress 2013 –Respiratory physiology in health and disease Year: 2013 Is it practical or important to include inspiratory capacity measurement in routine reversibility testing? Source: Eur Respir J 2005; 26: Suppl. 49, 121s Year: 2005 Worsening of gas exchange parameters at high FiO2 in COVID-19: misleading or informative? Source: Virtual Congress 2021 – Highlights in COVID-19 diagnosis and treatment Year: 2021 The use of noseclips during spirometry – is it really necessary? Source: Eur Respir J 2006; 28: Suppl. 50, 278s Year: 2006 Exercise testing to predict lung cancer surgery outcome: which is better - percentage of predicted VO2 or absolute value? Source: Eur Respir J 2004; 24: Suppl. 48, 672s Year: 2004 Diffusion capacity quality control in a research centre – Does the quality depend on the spirometry pattern? Source: Annual Congress 2010 - Quality measurement and improvement in lung function Year: 2010 The human lung: did evolution get it wrong? Source: Eur Respir J 2007; 29: 11-17 Year: 2007 Perception of adequacy of functional capacity : does it change with pulmonary rehabilitation Source: Eur Respir J 2002; 20: Suppl. 38, 263s Year: 2002 Workstation 2 - Spirometry: performing the test, safety measures, selecting the best values and simulating errors Source: International Congress 2014 – EW7 Spirometry knowledge and basic skills (European spirometry training programme) Year: 2014 The time interval between two determinations in the measurement of diffusing capacity Source: Eur Respir J 2003; 22: Suppl. 45, 145s Year: 2003 Performance comparison of two instruments for measurement of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity Source: Annual Congress 2009 - Quality control in lung function and new developments Year: 2009