Controversies in patients with acute respiratory failure

Pro and con debate
Chairs: L. Piquilloud (Lausanne, Switzerland)
Aims: To tackle three different controversial issue in the treatment of acute de novo respiratory failure, like the utility and effectiveness of steroid therapy, the rationale for performing lung biopsy in ARDS and finally the potential danger and utility of NIV to treat de novo respiratory failure.
PRO - Lung biopsy in ARDS
L. Bos (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcast
PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcast
CON - Lung biopsy in ARDS
C. Karagiannidis (Cologne, Germany)
PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcast
PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcast
PRO - NIV in acute hypoxemic failure
P. Navalesi (Padova, Italy)
PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcast
PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcast
CON - NIV in acute hypoxemic failure
A. Demoule (Paris, France)
PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcast
PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcast
PRO - Steroids in ARDS
S. Nava (Bologna (BO), Italy)
PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcast
PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcast
CON - Steroids in ARDS
P. Tuinman (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcast
PDF journal article, handout or slidesWebcast